Category Archives: 2008 Articles

December 2008

1st

1. Senate Seat Scandal—Blagojevich Sells Seat
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojeich, elected with help from the puppet who said Blagojeich ran “a sound administration,” is arrested for trying to sell the puppet’s vacant U.S. Senate seat to the highest bidder. For weeks, the puppet basically has no comment. Just before Christmas, he announces his staff did nothing improper. Both the puppet and Blagojeich also have ties to Tony Rezko.

2. Lied, People Died—Smoking Scandal
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

The puppet said he quit smoking when, in fact, he had not. The puppet lied to the American people about an issue that takes thousands of lives each year. He promises not to smoke in the White House though.

8th

1. Tony Rezko Scandal
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

The puppet buys a $1.65 million house in a nice neighborhood with help from indicted political fundraiser Tony Rezko and other pals. Rezko buys the lot next door AND sells it to the puppet for far less than its value. The puppet admits not handling that one properly. UPDATE—Feb 9.—the Federal Election Commission notified Judicial Watch that the puppet had in fact received a deeply discounted home loan (a savings of $108,000) from the other pals at Northern Trust. [Not a deal you could get!]

2. Appointment Scandal—Susan Rice
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

Susan Rice, nominated for U.N. Ambassador, wants U.S. troops to attack the Sudanese Military, to join U.N. forces on the ground in Darfur, and to enforce a No-Fly Zone over Darfur. Rice is too immature and dangerous to be placed in such a position of authority by the puppet, who demonstrates time and time again he is a very poor judge of character. Rice is a far-left blogger who calls conservatives ‘hacks’ and says she “cussed and spat” when George W. Bush spoke of Iraq. She actually believes George Bush deliberately decided not to protect from terrorists, States which voted Democrat! UPDATE—Rice was approved with support from wimpy Republicans.

3. The puppet’s Wife on “Court Ordered Inactive Status”
by Cole Firearms, Inc.—Information from http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/12/wtf-michelle-ob.html

Everyday another the puppet skeleton comes careening out of the closet. The media refers to the puppet’s wife as a ‘distinguished attorney’ despite the fact that [she] has been ‘inactive’ since 1993. This ADRC (ARDC—Attorney Registration and Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois) is for discipline reasons...not for those volunteering to stop practicing. It is court ordered…not “The puppet’s wife ordered.” Their website is very clear about their function and why they step in.

If this was a Republican, the Democrooks [referring to Democrats] would have her up on charges already. Schmoo, an attorney, points out: “sounds more to me like she was drummed right out of the practice of law. I am just dying to know what she did… she ran to have a court ordered inactive status done…and then no malpractice report needed to be provided. She wanted this to go away fast…and the details not [to] come out in depositions, courtroom documents, rulings for the client/plaintiffs…etc.

I would love to know what she did. I believe the puppet himself was also disciplined—I know his law license is on inactive. He lied about ever going by any other names when he applied for bar application. He also failed to state any prior drug use (which he admitted in his books…and he had outstanding tickets that were never paid).” What did she do that in 1993—after only four years—[that] her license to practice law was reviewed and put on inactive by a disciplinary agency? What is the ARDC? (It is not the Illinois Bar—where one can voluntarily be inactive.) As their name implies, [they are an] agency of the Supreme Court of Illinois which registers attorneys and investigates complaints of misconduct filed against attorneys holding a license to practice law in Illinois.

[Their] principal purpose is to assist the Supreme Court to determine a lawyer’s fitness to practice law in Illinois. If a complaint is made that an attorney, licensed to practice law in Illinois, has engaged in illegal, unethical or dishonest conduct, [they] will investigate and, if warranted, bring formal disciplinary charges. The Supreme Court of Illinois will then ultimately decide if a lawyer should be censured (publicly rebuked), suspended (having the law license to practice either taken away for a certain period of time or placed on a probationary period) or disbarred (having the law license taken away indefinitely). [They] cannot impose fines, imprison, obtain monetary damages, enforce remedies between the lawyer and client, or seek civil or criminal relief against a lawyer as part of the disciplinary process. [They] can affect only the lawyer’s ability to practice law in Illinois. [They] are not funded by taxpayers’ money. [They] are funded entirely by the annual registration fees paid by attorneys authorized to practice law in Illinois.

What is a Request for an investigation of an Attorney? It is a request [made to the ARDC] that [they] look into the conduct of an attorney who is believed to have acted improperly. [They] will review the request to determine if an investigation is warranted. In most cases, [they] will initiate an investigation where the information provided [to them] suggests that the attorney engaged in illegal, dishonest or unethical conduct. Filing a request accusing an attorney of unethical conduct is a serious matter to the lawyer. [They] recommend that, whenever practical, [the complaintor] tries to resolve any differences or disputes that do not concern claims of unethical conduct directly with the lawyer.

UpdateSchmoo—The attorney adds—”…as an attorney I am telling you that people can ‘choose’ to not pay their registration fees or take their continuing education of the bar and therefore go on “suspension…or inactive status that goes through the CAL BAR—the California Bar association.” Update—What was the puppet’s wife from the Southside of Chicago doing in 1993? In 1993, the organization Public Allies Chicago with 30 Allies is launched by founding Executive Director the puppet’s wife. President Clinton names Public Allies a model for national service. First Lady Hilary Clinton hosts Rose Garden reception for Public Allies at the White House.

Say what? The puppet’s wife and Hillary go back that far? In 1992, the puppet’s wife left her job at Sidley Austin to launch a career in public service, serving as an Assistant to Mayor Daley and then as the Assistant Commissioner of Planning and Development for the City of Chicago. (Ask yourself how did a 2-3 year attorney…just wound up being Mayor Daley’s assistant just like that…and what did she do as an ‘assistant?’ What does that even mean when you are a Harvard trained attorney?) Too close for comfort. Coincidental? Bernardine Dohrn, Bill Ayers’ wife was at Sidley Austin—a law firm in Chicago from 1984 to 1988. Dohrn was employed by the law firm Sidley Austin although her criminal record has prevented her from being admitted to either the New York or Illinois bar.

9th

The puppet’s wife is a “specifically named individual” on page 64 of an Affidavit submitted by the FBI
by Truthteller for No Quarter

Please read the Criminal Complaint filed by David W. Cain, Special Agent of the FBI. Details of the conversations Blagojevich had with his operatives about the puppet and the possibility the puppet would strike several deals with Blagojevich regarding the open Senate seat are discussed, and yes, quotations are provided.

I enjoy this gem from pages 63-64, where a telephone conversation between Blagojevich, Advisor B, a political consultant in Washington, D.C., another Washington, D.C., political consultant and John Harris, the Governor’s General Counsel, is discussed: Rod Blagojevich [Former Governor of Illinois] said that the consultants (Advisor B and another consultant are believed to be on the call at that time) are telling him that he has to “suck it up” for two years and do nothing and give this “mo******er” [the President-elect] his Senator. F*** him. For nothing? F*** him.”

Blagojevich states that he will put “[Senate Candidate 4]” in the Senate “before I just give f***ing [Senate Candidate 1] a f***ing Senate seat and I don’t get anything.” (Senate Candidate 4 is a Deputy Governor of the State of Illinois). Blagojevich stated that he needs to find a way to take the “financial stress” off of his family and that his wife is as qualified or more qualified than another specifically named individual to sit on corporate boards. According to Blagojevich, “The immediate challenge [is] how do we take some of the financial pressure off of our family.” Later in the phone call, Blagojevich stated that absent getting something back, Blagojevich will not pick Senate Candidate 1 (Harris); re-stated Blagojevich’s thoughts that they should ask the puppet for something for his financial security as well as maintain his political viability.

Harris said they could work out a three-way deal with SEIU and the President-elect, where SEIU could help the puppet with Blagojevich’s appointment of Senate Candidate 1 to the vacant Senate seat. Blagojevich would obtain a position as the National Director of the Change to Win campaign, and SEIU would get something favorable from the President-elect in the future. Senate Candidate 1 is Valerie Jarrett, a puppet advisor who also served as Daley’s Chief of Staff. Jarrett is very close to the the puppets. Senate Candidate 4 is either Dean Martinez, Bob Greenlee or Louanner Peters—all of whom are Deputy Governors of Illinois. The “specifically named individual” is the puppet’s wife, who was appointed to the Board of Treehouse Foods, a Wal-Mart vendor, on June 25, 2005, even though she did not have experience in the private sector previous to the appointment.

Here are the benefits the puppet family received as a result of the puppet’s wife’s stint with the Wal-Mart vendor: According to the couple’s tax returns, the puppet’s wife earned $51,200 for her work as a non-Executive Director on Treehouse’s board last year, on top of the $271,618 salary she was paid as a Vice-President of the University of Chicago Hospitals. She also received 7,500 Treehouse stock options, worth a further $72,375, as she did the previous year, when she banked a $45,000 salary from the company.

The puppet’s wife is the specifically named individual who was able to sit on corporate boards, although she lacks the experience of Blagojevich’s wife. And notice how the puppet’s wife’s position with the Wal-Mart vendor helped alleviate the financial stress of the  puppet family at a time when they were purchasing a mansion from Rezko they could not afford.

Why is this relevant? Blagojevich, according to the FBI complaint, thought the puppet could appoint his wife to corporate boards if he were to appoint Valerie Jarrett to the open Senate seat vacated by the puppet. I quote pages 54-55 of the criminal complaint filed by Special Agent of the FBI David Cain—By law, after the President-elect’s resignation of his position as a U.S. Senator, which was effective on November 16, 2008, Rod Blagojevich has sole authority to appoint his replacement for the two years remaining of the puppet’s Senate term.

During the course of this investigation, agents have intercepted a series of communications regarding the efforts of Blagojevich, John Harris, and others to misuse this power to obtain personal gain, including financial gain, for Rod Blagojevich and his family. In particular, Blagojevich has been intercepted conspiring to trade the Senate seat for particular positions that the President-elect has the power to appoint (e.g. the Secretary of Health and Human Services). Blagojevich has also been intercepted conspiring to sell the Senate seat in exchange for his wife’s placement on paid corporate boards or Blagojevich placement at a private foundation in a significant position with a substantial salary. Blagojevich has also been intercepted conspiring to sell the Senate seat in exchange for millions of dollars in funding for a non-profit organization that he would start and that would employ him at a substantial salary after he left the governorship.

Blagojevich, in other words, assumed the puppet would appoint his wife to a board for the political favor of selecting Valerie Jarrett for the Senate seat. Blagojevich is not a stupid man. Indeed, he only assumed the puppet would participate in this pay to play scheme, for he knows the puppet is acutely aware how the game is played in Illinois and in Chicago This explains why Blagojevich mentions Michelle the puppet and her lack of qualifications to serve on the Board of TreeHouse Foods when he discusses how the puppet could appoint Mrs. Blagojevich to a board for the political favor of appointing Jarrett to the U.S. Senate seat. The puppet’s wife, after all, was appointed to sit on the Board of TreeHouse foods after the puppet was elected to the U.S. Senate. Moreover, the puppet’s wife’s salary at The University of Chicago nearly tripled after her husband gained the power to submit earmark requests on her employer’s behalf. Just appoint the spouse to a board and increase his or her salary if you need a political favor from an Illinois politician.

That is how the play to pay game is played. Blagojevich understands this, and he knows the puppet understands this. Why else does FBI Agent Cain report the following discussion that occurred on Nov 8, 2008? On November 8, 2008, Rod Blagojevich talked with John Harris about the Senate seat. During the conversation, Blagojevich and Harris discussed whether it would be possible to obtain a financial benefit for Blagojevich’s wife in relation to the Senate seat. Specifically, Blagojevich referred to his wife’s Series 7 license and asked “is there a play here, with these guys, with her” to work for a firm in Washington or New York at a significantly better salary than she is making now. Also, Blagojevich wanted to know whether SEIU could do something to get his wife a position at Change to Win until he could take a position at Change to Win.

The puppet’s wife, Blagojevich implies, received an appointment to a board for which she was not qualified as a result of a ‘pay to play’ scheme. What about his wife? After all, puppet ally Valerie Jarrett wants the Senate seat. What about Blagojevich’s wife? What about Blagojevich’s financial stress? Blagojevich and his advisers only thought of this as a possibility, for they knows the puppet has already played the game. Again, these are smart men who know the rules of the game. Why else would they think the puppet would participate in a pay to play scheme? The puppet’s wife was paid for someone to play, they thought. What about Mrs. Blagojevich? Besides, Mrs. Blagojevich has a Series 7 license. All the puppet’s wife has is a license to practice law that was revoked as a result of a court order in 1993. Blagojevich thought the puppet would pay to play, as the the puppets have been engaged in pay to play schemes in the past. That is what Blagojevich thought, and that is why the puppets are yet again mentioned in a complaint filed in a Court of Law.

18th

Senate Seat Scandal—Rahm-Rod-ing Valerie Jarrett
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

As scandal breaks about filling the puppet’s Senate seat, word leaks out that the puppet point-man Rahm Emanuel tried to shove Valerie Jarrett down Rod Blagojevich’s throat. With no promised reward for Blagojevich, the Illinois Governor told the new president, “No deal!”

22nd

Appointment Scandal—Robert Gates
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

The puppet gets in big trouble with CodePink and MoveOn for keeping Bush Defense Sec. Robert Gates and more than 150 of the 250 political appointees at the Pentagon. Liberals are mad at the puppet suggestion that there might not be any changes they can believe in.

November 2008

1st

Gun Rights Flip-Flop
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

First the puppet“I have no intention of taking away folks’ guns.”
Second the puppet —supports the D.C. handgun ban, saying it is Constitutional. “We can have a reasonable, thoughtful gun control measure that I think respects the Second Amendment and people’s traditions.” UPDATE—Feb. ’09—the puppet’s Attorney General Eric Holder has tried to link the Mexican drug-war to U.S. gun sales and go after assault weapons.

Birth Certificate Controversy
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

Some believe he was born in Kenya, not the U.S.A. That would, of course, make him ineligible to be President. There are many [including me] who do not believe this story is true. Others believe it firmly. Still, why can’t any of the hot shot reporters find out once and for all?

Peace, Prosperity and the Coming HolocaustChapter One
by Dave Hunt

Dave Hunt (1926 –) is a Christian apologist, speaker, radio commentator and author. He has been in full-time ministry since 1973. The Berean Call ministry, which highlights Dave’s materials, was started in 1990. Hunt has traveled to the Near East, lived in Egypt, and written numerous books on theology, prophecy, cults, and other religions, including critiques of Catholicism, Islam, Mormonism, and Calvinism, among others. His books have sold over 4 million copies and have been translated into at least 20 languages.

  • A Contrary Scenario

Peddling gloom and doom has become a huge and prosperous business. Investment advisers have made fortunes frightening millions of people with their solemn warnings about the death of the dollar and the collapse of the world financial system. Self-proclaimed experts at peering into the future, from psychic seers to social scientists and Christian fundamentalists, warn of spreading famine compounded by the population explosion and the alarming loss of farming land by erosion and pollution. We are told that cataclysmic upheavals of the land and oceans will soon change major coastlines, wiping out large cities at the cost of billions of dollars and millions of lives. Even the CIA has gotten into the act, predicting that capriciously changing weathers patterns will so disrupt production of major crops that the end of this decade could well see hordes of starving people marching across continents in search of food.

Ecologists add their dire predictions to the thickening gloom—that our oceans and lakes are dying and even Earth’s atmosphere is being polluted beyond remedy. Scientific studies warn that Earth is running out of potable water and that complete ecological collapse could come with surprising suddenness. According to some experts, the only thing that may save us from completing the gradual destruction of planet Earth is a nuclear holocaust. This horrifying prospect is persuasively presented as all but inevitable by the dual argument that—1) no hope remains to stop the daily and insane continued production and deployment of more and more nuclear weapons (said to be a million times more destructive than the Hiroshima bomb), in spite of the fact that we already have enough to destroy the earth ten times over; and 2) humanity has never failed to use any major weapon it has developed.

  • Apocalypse Now?

The only question among the gloom-and-doomers seems to be whether a nuclear or economic holocaust will hit us first. As to the latter, there is almost unanimous agreement that the world is headed for a repeat performance of the Great Depression of the 1930s, except that this one will be far worse! The Daily News Digest, a sophisticated investment advisory letter that condenses the important news from many sources, sent out a promotional mailing in October 1982 warning that “the coming economic, cultural and political upheaval could be unequaled in modern history….Remember: erupting deficits, artificially low interest rates, skyrocketing taxes, a falling money supply and a stock market boom were the final warning signs just prior to the crash of 1929…and are now signaling an even more devastating collapse directly ahead!” At about the same time, the highly regarded weekly investment advisory service International Moneyline issued the following dire predictions—

Reaganomics will fail…it’s just about over. The casino is still open, but the hour is late…we’re on the brink of disaster.  After the financial panic, the economy will fall faster and farther than anyone now expects….the world is headed for an economic abyss and there’s literally nothing that anyone can do to stop it….There never has been a more certain scenario. A very similar gloom-and-doom scenario is endorsed by leading international bankers and government agencies.  The annual report of The World Bank, released in August 1982, “painted a gloomy economic picture…the continuing worldwide recession…high and volatile interest rates…and growing debt repayment burdens.”

The nine largest U.S. banks have a debt exposure to developing countries and Eastern Europe equal to more than twice their total capital; and many of these countries have neither the ability nor the intention to repay, placing the U.S. banking system in jeopardy. Early in September 1982, Third World leaders of the so-called Group of 24 (developing countries ranging from Algeria to Zaire and including Mexico, Brazil, Nigeria, and Argentina) issued a communiqué directed at The World Bank and International Monetary Fund. It warned that the collapse of the entire international monetary system and a worldwide depression were imminent. In desperation, the IMF took some emergency measures, but the international crisis has only grown worse, with several other countries joining Mexico on the brink of bankruptcy.

  • Has Doom and Disaster Been Overdone?

The obvious seldom happens. Could it be that the disasters everyone fears and talks about will never materialize? If so, does the future actually hold something even worse? Or could it be very good? Under the present conditions, optimism seems a fool’s dream. Yet there is a growing sense that good times lie ahead, and this contrary opinion is held by a number of very perceptive observers. They reject the almost-unanimous consensus of doom—not out of a commitment to optimism but based upon careful research. For example, Reason Magazine reporter Kelly Ross discovered that, contrary to popular reports, we’re not running out of farm land.

Top researchers at Rand Corporation are predicting, in spite of much hand-wringing about spreading famine due to a population explosion, that “declining birthrates [in the United States] and the resulting scarcity of young workers will usher in a boom time of low unemployment and huge gains in real wages.” The Rand group’s surprising conclusion continues—“By the end of this decade, employers will be forced to institute huge wage increases to compete for dwindling numbers of young workers…wage hikes will outstrip inflation, resulting in significantly increased real incomes and purchasing power.”

The contrary opinion that good times lie ahead is shared by a growing number of experts. Robert Muller has been called “the philosopher of the United Nations and its prophet of hope.” Having served the United Nations for 33 years, he has “performed diplomatic missions all over the world and today is Assistant Secretary-General in charge of coordinating the work of the 32 specialized agencies and world programs of the United Nations. Certainly one of the best-informed men in the world, Muller is convinced that “there will be no third world war between the big powers,” but instead he believes we are headed for a “new age, a new world…a New Genesis, a true global, God†-abiding political, moral, and spiritual renaissance to make this planet at long last what it was always meant to be—the Planet of God†.” Though he claims to be a good Catholic, his God† is definitely not the personal God† of the Bible†, but an impersonal basic cosmic force residing within everyone and everything, “that impels us to respond to our evolutionary duties and…further ascent.” His vision for a new age is shared by many other world leaders, and we will discover in a later chapter exactly what this means.

Herman Kahn, head of the Hudson Institute, a New York research organization dedicated to predicting the future, declares—“Even with all the problems we now face, mankind and the U.S. have a great future!” Disagreeing with the prophets of doom, Kahn recently predicted that “…many of the fears plaguing Americans today will be all but forgotten in the coming years.” Based upon his painstaking research, Kahn predicts that the population explosion will soon fizzle, with the birthrate dropping and the world population stabilizing at about 10 billion; the world is not running out of natural resources, since vast supplies lie untapped in space and in the Earth’s oceans; we have plenty of energy and will never run out of fossil fuels, since there is enough coal alone to last hundreds of years; in addition to nuclear power, there is also solar energy and thermal heat beneath the Earth’s surface in an almost-unlimited potential that we have scarcely begun to develop; all of the pollution problems that now seem so serious will eventually be solved; the inflation rate will drop below five percent and there will be a worldwide economic boom; computers will be the key to much of the above; and genetic engineering will make food plentiful and cheap by developing new edible plants that can be grown in saltwater.

  • Bear Turns to Bull

In the midst of thickening worldwide gloom, the unbelievable happened in mid-August 1982. With unemployment in the United States at a post-World-War-II record and still rising in Europe, Japan, and Canada, millions of Americans suffering from indigestion on a steady diet of gloom-and-doom were caught by surprise. Wall Street was shivering under a heavy cloud of overwhelmingly bearish sentiment. The highest percentage of investment advisory services in 40 years was directly warning that the Stock Market still had a long way to fall. Led by ace prognosticator Joe Granville, many experts were forecasting a worse crash than the one that shook the Street in 1929. The Dow Jones averages had been tracing out a series of new lows and looked as though they were heading over the cliff for sure…when suddenly the bear turned into a wild bull.

Exploding to the upside without warning and for no apparent reason, the market repeatedly broke volume and price records, catapulting the Dow ahead by 18 percent in a few never-to-be-forgotten days. Everyone was left gasping and the experts were dumbfounded, unable to explain or believe what had happened. For months, domestic and world news had bred increasing pessimism. Hopes for a settlement following the Israeli invasions of Lebanon had sunk to a new low. In spite of the brave forecasts by the Reagan administration, the recession was worsening, unemployment was still inching higher, and bankruptcies were at a record rate, rivaling even the 1932 worldwide depression. High interest rates, which were squeezing the economic lifeblood out of the already-anemic veins of American industry, labor and consumers, looked to be heading back up again higher than ever. Then suddenly, without any warning, the news began sounding too good to be true. On August 18, 1982, the front pages of major newspapers around the country trumpeted headlines and unexpected stories that marked a turning point.

For example, page 1 of the Los Angeles Times carried lead articles with such titles as End of Sorrows’ Near, Lebanese Premiere Says; and Stocks Set Record For One-Day Gain, Dow Leaps 38.81 Points In Wall Street Optimism Over Falling Interest Rates. In what appeared to be a sudden and complete reversal of his previous position, Mark Skousen, a leading gloom-and-doomer, declared in a promotional mailer in August 1982—Contrary to much popular opinion, President Reagan’s economic recovery measures are going to start working—powerfully! The investment climate will shift sharply before the year’s end, and you will have the opportunity to make more money than you ever have before! Interest rates will drop. Stocks and bonds will come to the verge of a bull market. The economy will show surprising strength and may well lead us into a major boom! [emphasis in original].

Looking back now, August 1982 seemed almost certain to be recognized by historians as one of the most dramatic and sudden reversals of the world economic and political climate in history. In the depths of the darkest valley of despair, the forgotten flowers of hope suddenly began to bloom once again—though the majority of people still couldn’t detect their fragile fragrance. Oblivious to the continued bad economic news, the deteriorating relations with the Soviet Union, and the ecological collapse on the horizon, not only Wall Street but other stock markets around the world continued to climb higher.

  • The Thickening Gloom

Whatever the mysterious surge in stock prices was trying to say, few of the experts were willing to listen. Skepticism was as rampant as ever. Most financial prognosticators are still convinced that the unbelievable happenings on Wall Street have been a deceptive flash in the pan that will disappear in a puff of smoke and leave us more thoroughly disillusioned and worse off than ever. Their arguments are persuasive and their predictions frightening.  An Economic News Review and Financial Digest mailer headlined How to Survive the 1983 Currency Call-In warned of the imminent collapse of the American dollar. The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor allowed a little more time before financial doom. It predicted that the most massive inflationary binge imaginable lies just ahead, which will culminate in the most devastating inflationary blow-off in U.S. history…plunging this nation and the world into the Depression of 1987-1994.

The promotional mailer sent out in the fall of 1982 by Gary North’s Remnant Review was no less explicit. Its warnings of economic and financial doom just ahead included the prediction that “President Reagan’s economic policies will be completely scrapped as he gets blamed for the worst recession in recent history.” The McAlvany Intelligence Advisor keeps its investors fully informed on events around the world that could affect their investments. Its recent warnings include the following—Third World debt is on the verge of wiping out dozens of America’s largest banksTerrorists in Africa are even now working towards dominating the world’s supply of gold, diamonds and strategic metalsSoviet-trained agitators are surfacing once again on U.S. college campuses…for another round of anti-draft, anti-Reagan, anti-nuclear demonstrations—and they’ve promised to cause even more havoc than their predecessors in the ’60s. The Federal Reserve Board is quietly re-inflating the nation’s money supply…guaranteeing another round of high inflation just around the corner. The Gromyko Plan, dormant during the early Reagan Presidency, has once again shifted into high gear, virtually assuring the Soviets complete dominance of the Middle East oil fields by 1985.

  • The Fundamentalist Scenario

Over the last 20 years, fundamentalist writers and preachers have incorporated most of these grim forecasts into their interpretations of Scripture, fueling a growing interest in Bible† prophecies about the last days. Christians generally believe that the gloom-and-doom-financial-collapse-nuclear-holocaust-is-coming-scenario coincides with the signs that Jesus† predicted would herald the nearness of His† return. But is this really true?  Perhaps we’re overlooking something. Could the timing and sequence of events be different from what most Christians expect? A worldwide economic collapse followed by the greatest war in history and a nuclear holocaust do seem to be prophesied in the Bible†. These events are part of that period described in Scripture as the Great Tribulation prophesied for the last days that lead up to Armageddon. However, there are statements in the Bible† about the last days that just as clearly speak of peace and safety and imply great prosperity. Understanding the timing of end-time events is clearly of primary importance—what comes when, and how?

The voices predicting a worsening of conditions in the months ahead, leading to economic collapse and World War III, are so numerous, so well-qualified, and so persuasive that it seems foolish to adopt any other view. And so many events unfolding in the world today seem to fit neatly into the popularly believed scenario of impending disaster. For example, there are a number of sensational developments that Christians point to as evidence that the Antichrist is soon to make his bid for power. A huge computer in Europe, affectionately nicknamed the Beast by its creators, is supposed to be tied in already to the worldwide banking network in apparent readiness to fulfill the prophecies in Revelation 13 concerning the control of all buying and selling by the Antichrist. There are rumors that computer systems around the world have already been set up to read a mark on the forehead and/or hand that includes the Antichrist’s number 666 just as the Bible† predicts; and even that certain individuals have already received by mistake Social Security checks requiring such identification. These have been recalled hastily and replaced by the government with the embarrassed explanation that they were not to be issued until 1984.

The alarmed voices warning of the imminent appearance of Antichrist, with Armageddon just beyond, have reached a crescendo. Others confidently proclaim, with full-page ads in major newspapers, that we are to witness “the reappearance of the Christ†.” Who is right? Is it possible that both are wrong, and that the world is facing a great surprise?

  • A Contrary Scenario

Bible prophecy is often purposely clothed in double or obscure meanings and seemingly contradictory statements for important reasons. This is why it is so easy to succumb to the natural human tendency to color our interpretations of Bible† prophecy by our estimate of what we think is going to happen, based on conditions and apparent trends in the world around us. Instead, we must be willing to let the Bible† be its own interpreter. This is particularly difficult in a time when gloom-and-doom is so unanimously accepted among the experts on the future, both Christian and non-Christian.

If we can manage to close our ears to the voices of today’s prophets and seers, then the Bible† seems to be saying something else. Economic collapse and another great war do not seem to be the next events predicted in Scripture. In spite of appearances to the contrary in the world around us today, a careful examination of the Biblical description of the ‘last days’ prior to the second coming of Jesus Christ† seems rather to suggest that boom, not bust, lies just ahead! Jesus seemed to place the time of His return in a period of unusual worldwide prosperity—“For the coming of the Son of Man will be just like the days of Noah…before the flood they were eating and drinking, they were marrying and giving in marriage….” There was probably never a time in human history when everyone felt so secure in the enjoyment of peace and prosperity as just before the flood. The Laodicean church which Bible† scholars generally agree represents the church on earth in the last days, is pictured as wealthy and in need of nothing—hardly indicative of either a worldwide financial collapse or a nuclear holocaust.

In contrast to the gloom-and-doom and frightening forecasts of the vast majority of Christians and non-Christians alike, we shall propose A Contrary Scenarioa coming new age of unprecedented peace and prosperity just over the horizon! However, there will be some startling surprises, necessitating great caution, all predicted in the Bible†. As King Solomon warned long ago—The complacency of fools shall destroy them. The prosperity teaching so popular among evangelicals today could fit millions of professing Christians into the coming new age. Whether that is good or bad is a matter of opinion, and we will deal with this very carefully in the following pages. If the Bible† is true, then the coming new age of peace and prosperity could be the most dangerous period in human history, a time of mind-boggling deception that will be humanly irresistible. The Apostle Paul called it the great delusion and associated it with what he referred to as the lie. What is this lie? And why should a new age of unprecedented peace and prosperity actually precipitate a holocaust of such proportions that the survival of the human race will take a miracle? That will become increasingly clear as we develop our contrary scenario.

Peace, Prosperity and the Coming Holocaust
Short selections from Chapter Five: The Coming World Government
by Dave Hunt

A ruthless, vicious, totalitarian government, saying all of the right things about peace, love, and brotherhood, will soon take control of planet Earth. Nothing can stop it. The United States, after its sudden and mysterious collapse, will be powerless, a mere pawn in the process. Will this be something that the fabled Trilateralists will bring about? No, the conspiracy is much larger than that and far too powerful for the Trilateralists to control. Much of the alarmist nature has been rumored about a conspiracy among top political leaders in Washington to betray America’s National interest. These men, all members or former members of the Trilateral Commission and/or Council of Foreign Relations (CFR), are said to be working hand in glove with certain highly placed Communist leaders in an international conspiracy to bring about a world government….There is no doubt some truth in such reports. However, the Trilateralists and CFR people are invariably referred to with exaggerations that seem to attribute omniscience and omnipotence to the internationalists.

It is a fact that members of several elite political organizations here and abroad are part of an international conspiracy to establish a world government. However, is that so bad? How else can there be a just and lasting worldwide peace? Surely a world government should not be considered evil, but the best hope for preventing a nuclear holocaust. Yet many object that it could only be established at the cost of freedoms that Westerners hold dear….In several of his books, H. G. Wells seems to have anticipated with uncanny accuracy the steps leading to the coming world government. While proposing a worldwide benevolent socialism, he had no illusions about communism, which he rejected with these words—”In practice, Marxism is found to…resort to malignantly destructive activities and…to be practically impotent in the face of material difficulties. In Russia, where…Marxism has been put to the test…each year shows more and more clearly that Marxism and communism are digressions from the path of human progress….The one main strand of error in that theory is the facile assumption that the people at a disadvantage will be stirred to anything more than chaotic and destructive expressions of resentment….We reject…the delusive belief in that magic giant, the Proletariat, who will dictate, arrange, restore and create….”

Instead, he predicted that the new world order would be in the hands of “an elite of intelligent religious-minded people.” The religion of these sincere conspirators, as Wells laid it out and confessed it to be his own, was exactly what the Bible describes as the religion of the coming Antichrist! Few people will notice this, however, so intent will they be upon saving the world from nuclear holocaust. Their goals will be so sincere and seem so logical—that a lasting, genuine peace can only come through worldwide control over the nationalistic interests that otherwise compete for territories, resources, wealth, and power, and that create wars in the process….

Raised to be an evangelical by his mother, Wells became an apostate enemy of Christianity. A close friend of T. H. Huxley, Wells was an avid evolutionist and an atheist. Yet he had a religion, a belief that an elite of Godlike men would evolve in due time, “take the world in hand and create a sane order.” The world would be transformed through his apostate religion. It is doubtful that Wells realized that he was prophesying the fulfillment of a Biblical prophecy—“Let no one in any way deceive you, for…the apostasy comes first…, and [then] the man of lawlessness is revealed, the son of destruction.” ...Wells, however, seemed to know that it would not come in his generation, but probably in the next—For my generation, the role of John the Baptist must be our extreme ambition. We can proclaim and make evident the advent of a new phase of human faith and effort. We can point out the path it has been our lifework to discover…”Here,” we say, “is…the basis for a new world.”

The idea of a world government has been around for a long time. What is new today is the fact that almost everyone is coming to the same conclusion, and in the desperation of the hour millions of people are doing something about it….As H. G. Wells predicted, the conspiracy has now become an open movement involving hundreds of millions of believers. Most of these open conspirators, as Wells prophesied, have in mind a worldwide unity that will be built less upon government than the internationalists intend, and more upon a fundamental people-to-people relationship. That this could very well happen is being demonstrated by networks of thousands of groups of ordinary citizens already working together around the world in the new and powerful peace movement. Again it seems to have been anticipated by Wells, who wrote—“What we work toward is synthesis, and this communal effort is the adventure of humanity.”

Something important is taking shape—a huge, growing, grass-roots movement that is not so much political as it is religious, though not in the ordinary sense. It is a new spirituality, a mysticism that is too big to be confined within the narrow limits of any religion. Dr. [Fritjov] Capra, brilliant University of California at Berkeley research physicist, declared: We live today in a globally interconnected world…[requiring] an ecological perspective…a new vision of reality, a fundamental change in our thoughts, perceptions and values….It is interesting that when H. G. Wells wrote of the open conspiracy that would eventually establish the new world order, he declared—”This is my religion…the truth and the way of salvation….It is astir already in many intelligences…an immense and hopeful revolution in human affairs….”

There is overwhelming evidence that what Wells predicted is happening at last, that it is not a chance phenomenon, and that it is already much too big for the Trilateralists to control….We face not only a coming world government, but also a coming world religion. In the space age, it must have the endorsement of science. What could this religion be? It takes no great genius to realize that if the Bible† calls its leader the Antichrist, then this religion must be antichristian. However, Jesus† Himself warned that this man would pretend to be the Christ, and that his masquerade would be so clever and convincing that it would “mislead, if possible, even the elect.”

7th

Scandalthe puppet insults Nancy Reagan
post by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

The puppet said, “I didn’t want to get into a Nancy Reagan thing about doing any seances.” A reference to Nancy Reagan talking with Astrologers while she was living in the White House. Smooth.

Berg v. the puppet, Case 08-cv-01933
post by http://obamacrimes.com/?p=125

Plaintiff: PHILIP J. BERG
Defendant: the puppet
Case Number: 1:2008cv01933               Filed: November 7, 2008
Court:District Of Columbia District Court
Office: Other Statutory Actions Office    County: 88888 Presiding Judge: Judge Richard W. Roberts

In the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, United States of America Ex Rel.

Phillip J. Berg, Plantiff; the puppet, Jr., Defendant

United States’ Memorandum of Law in Opposition to Relator Philip J. Berg’s Motion for Reconsideration

The United States respectfully opposes the Relator Philip J. Berg’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s June 9, 2009 Order dismissing this action with prejudice under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(c)(2)(A). The Order followed the clear and binding precedent of this Circuit which recognizes the United States’ virtually ’unfettered’ discretion” to dismiss a qui tam suit as an exercise of prosecutorial discretion. See United States ex rel. Hoyte v. American National Red Cross, 518 F. 3d 61, 65 (D.C. Cir. 2008); Swift v. United States, 318 F.3d 250, 251-54 (D.C. Cir. 2003). As the Court acknowledged: “Nothing in § 3730(c)(2)(A) purports to deprive the Executive Branch of its historical prerogative to decide which cases should go forward in the name of the United States.” Swift, 318 F. 3d at 253. Relator points to no new fact or law that would meet his heavy burden of justifying reconsideration. He misapplies the governing conflict of interest statutes and asks the Court to radically rewrite the False Claims Act (FCA) to permit private citizens to proceed with actions on behalf of the United States with no mechanism for government control over the litigation.

I. Relator’s Motion For Reconsideration Is Disfavored. “[M]otions for reconsideration under Rule 59(e) are’ disfavored’ and’ should be granted only under extraordinary circumstances.’” N.Y.C. Apparel FZE. v. U.S. Customs and Border Protection Bureau, F.2d , 2009 WL 1464962, 1 (D.D.C. May 27, 2009) (citations omitted). Such a motion should not be granted “unless the district court finds that there is an intervening change of controlling law, the availability of new evidence, or the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice.” Messina v. Krakower, 439 F.3d 755,758 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (internal citation and quotation marks omitted). Relator points to no change in law or new evidence and therefore must prove a clear error or manifest injustice to prevail, which he plainly has not done.

II. Relator Cannot Use Federal Conflict Of Interest Law To Preclude Department Of  Justice Attorneys From Handling Their Employer’s Cases Relator’s reliance on federal conflict of interest laws misses the mark entirely. As a threshold matter, he cites no authority giving him standing to enforce these criminal and civil rules on government employee conduct. But see Scherer v. United States, 241 F. Supp. 2d 1270, 1284 (D. Kan, 2003) (ruling criminal and civil conflict of interest authorities cited by relator create no private right of action).

In addition, he focuses on the alleged impropriety of the Attorney General Participating in this matter when the Attorney General has appeared on not one of the United States’ pleadings. More importantly, Relator fundamentally misstates the law when he argues that neither the Attorney General, nor any Department of Justice attorney, may play a role in his FCA case because all are ostensibly employed by the President of the United States, a party to the action. This novel interpretation of the law would bar any government attorney from ever participating in any lawsuit where the President (or for that matter, our true employer, the United States) was either the plaintiff or the defendant.

Arguably, neither the Solicitor General, nor any Department of Justice attorney could participate, for example, in the many cases brought against Presidents Bush and the puppet involving the habeas corpus rights of Guantanamo detainees. See, e.g., Rasul v. Bush, 542 U.S. 466 (2004); Kiyemba v Obama, 561 F.3d 509 (D.C. Cir. 2009). Government attorneys could not defend the United States in suits against the United States, nor, bringing criminal, False Claims Act, civil rights, or environmental cases on the United States’ behalf. That simply is not, and cannot be, the law. The statutory and regulatory provisions, upon which Relator seems to rely, (see Mem. Supp. Relator’s Mot. Recon. 44-47), do not mandate the disqualification of Department of Justice attorneys from this matter, or from other matters involving their government employer.

First,  on its face restricts government employees from certain interactions with government “other than in the proper discharge of official duties,” see 18 U.S.C. § 205(a), but does not limit how government employees carry out their official duties, which is what Relator complains of here when he argues that Department of Justice attorneys lacked authority to dismiss his case. Second, 18 U.S.C. § 208 restricts government employees from participating in matters in which they have “a financial interest,” which again is not an issue here. As highlighted above, only an absurd reading of the law would impute to federal employees a financial interest in a matter simply because their employer—whether conceived to be the President, their employing agency, or the United States of America, has an interest in the outcome of a particular case. Finally, Relator’s argument is likewise unsupported by 5 C.F.R. § 2635.502, which restricts government employees from participating in certain matters where a person with whom they have a “covered relationship” is a party, and specifies that government employees have a covered relationship with “any person for whom the employee has, within the last year, served as .. an employee.” 5 C.F.R. § 2635.502 (b)(iv). Again, as highlighted above, only an absurd interpretation would apply this ban to an employee’s current government employer rather than to past employers who are the clear targets of such a conflict of interest rule. As a practical matter, the Department of Justice might as well be disbanded if this rule prohibited government employees from participating in any case in which their current government employer is a party.

III. The FCA Does Not Allow a Relator to Proceed With No Government Role

Moreover, even if it were true that the Department of Justice, and indeed following the train of his argument, the entire Executive Branch, is barred from participating in Relator’s suit because the President is our employer, it would not follow, as Relator suggests, that he could proceed with his FCA suit. The qui tam provisions of the FCA provide only a limited authorization for a private citizen to proceed with a lawsuit on behalf of the United States and clearly contemplate that will happen only where the government has the opportunity to make an intervention decision, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(4), and even if it declines to intervene, to play a continuing role in the case

As the Court has recognized, the FCA expressly allows for the government to dismiss unwanted qui tam cases as on exercise of prosecutorial discretion. 31 U.S.C. § 3730(c)(2)(A), Whenthe United States alternatively decides not to prosecute a given qui tam suit but to allow the relator to proceed, the case is still brought on behalf of the United States, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(1), the United States still receives at least 70 percent of the recovery, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(d), and the FCA therefore still explicitly provides numerous other mechanisms for continued government involvement and control. See generally Riley v. St. Luke’s Episcopal Hospital, 252 F.3d 749, 753-57 (5th Cir. 200!) (setting forth that even when the government declines to intervene in a qui tam mad the relator proceeds, the government may inter alias: veto a settlement urged by the relator, 31 U.S,C. § 3730(b)(1); settle over a relator’s objections, 31 U.S.C. § 3730 (c)(2)(B); intervene for good cause and take over the prosecution of the suit, 31 U.S.C, § 3730(c)(3); elect to be served with copies of all pleadings and deposition transcripts, 31 U:S.C. § 3730(c)(3); and seek a stay of discovery where relator’s prosecution of the suit would interfere with an ongoing government investigation, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(c)(4)). Thus, relator can point to no authority, under the FCA that would allow him to proceed with a qui tam suit under his sole control, with the government effectively recused from the case. IV. Conclusion For all of these reasons, Relator Philip J. Berg’s motion for reconsideration has no merit and the United States respectfully requests that it be denied. Respectfully submitted, Tony West, Assistant Attorney General

Unconstitutional Community Service Plan
post by http://www.heartlessandbrainless.com/2008/11/obamas-unconstitutional-community.html

Andrew Sullivan rightly points out the absurdity of John Derbyshire comparing the puppet’s community service plan to Hitler and Stalin. At the same time, I’ve really gotta question the Constitutionality of some parts of this ‘noble’ idea. Change.gov website—the puppet will call on citizens of all ages to serve America, by developing a plan to require 50 hours of community service in middle school and high school and 100 hours of community service in college every year. The puppet will encourage retiring Americans to serve by improving programs available for individuals over age 55, while at the same time promoting youth programs such as Youth Build and Head Start.

First of all, it really could be considered by some ‘involuntary servitude’ to force high school students prior to the age where they can drop out from high school do mandatory labor. And that is banned by the Thirteen Amendment. Second, where does the Federal Government get off dictating terms of graduation to private and State-run colleges in order to force college students to do unpaid labor? Whatever monstrosity of a bill that will turn this reform into law will probably have to use the threat of losing Federal education funds in order to even accomplish this supposedly-noble goal. This strikes as the worst sort of federal intervention in education for the most trivial reasons. Let’s leave local school boards to decide whether or not to enforce a community service graduation requirement. And let’s please not use the bludgeon of the Federal Government to disrupt a pretty well-functioning system of private universities

17th

Texas (English as official Language) Gov.Perry[R]
Timeline:

  • 03/02/2009 HJR32—Read first time; Referred to State Affairs
  • 03/02/2009 HJR27—Read first time, referred to State Affairs
  • 12/05/2008 HJR32—Filed
  • 11/17/2008 HJR27—Filed

House Joint Resolution (HJR) 27 Sponsored by: Berman[R]
House Joint Resolution (HJR) 32 Sponsored by: Rep(s) Berma [R], Riddle[R], Fletcher[R], Brown[R]
A JOINT RESOLUTION: Proposing a constitutional amendment to establish English as the official language of Texas and require that official acts of government be taken in English.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION 1. The Legislature finds and declares:
(1) the people of the United States have brought to this nation the cultural heritage of many nations; (2) the people of the United States, despite their many differences, have lived together harmoniously and productively as citizens of one nation; (3) the traditional and common language of the United States and of this state is English; (4) a knowledge of the common language is essential to full exercise of constitutional freedoms, informed and knowledgeable empowerment as voters, citizen checks against government abuses, individual prosperity, and independence; (5) the English language has been our strongest bond to one another as fellow citizens and has contributed substantially to national unity and societal cohesiveness; (6) English has been this nation’s language by custom only and warrants special legal protection; (7) government has a fiduciary responsibility to the citizenry to ensure that it operates as efficiently as possible, and the growth of multiple language bureaucracies and printing represents an abrogation of this fiduciary responsibility; and (8) this State, its political subdivisions, and the federal government have a responsibility to ensure that citizens have opportunities to learn English.
SECTION 2. Article XVI, Texas Constitution, is amended by adding Section 73 to read as follows—Sec. 73.
(a) In this section, “official act of government” means—(1) an action of this state or a political subdivision of this State that carries the full weight and authority of law; or (2) an official document recorded or first maintained on or after December 1, 2009, by this State or a political subdivision of this State for the public domain, including a tax record, professional license, deed, real estate record, publicly probated will or other document of a court system, or a public proceeding of a governing body of this State or a political subdivision of this State. (b) It is the purpose of this section to preserve, protect, and strengthen the unifying role of English as the official language of this State. (c) English is the official language of this State and is the language of official acts of government. (d) This State or a political subdivision of this State may not make any policy expressing a preference for any language other than English or diminishing or ignoring the unifying role of English as designated by this section, except as provided by Subsection (f). (e) An elected or appointed officer of this State or a political subdivision of this state shall take all reasonable steps to ensure that the role of English as the official language of this State is preserved and enhanced.
(f) This section does not—(1) supersede contrary provisions imposed under federal law; (2) prohibit the use of another language for the public safety, health, or justice; prohibit instruction in foreign language courses; (4) prohibit instruction designed to aid students with limited English proficiency in their transition and integration into the education system; (5) prohibit the promotion of international commerce or tourism; or (6) prohibit a court or an administrative agency from admitting into evidence or relying on a record that is from another jurisdiction and originally written in another language, if the court or agency determines the record is necessary for a proceeding or hearing.
(g) The Legislature or a governing body of a political subdivision of this State may not appropriate any money to promote the use of or demonstrate a preference for any language other than the official language, except as provided by Subsection (f).
(h) This section may not be—(1) construed in any way to infringe on the rights of citizens, who have every right to choose their own primary language, in the use of language for private conduct; or (2) used to dictate language policies for the operation and administration of organizations or businesses in the private sector.
SECTION 3. This proposed constitutional amendment shall be submitted to the voters at an election to be held November 3, 2009.  The ballot shall be printed to permit voting for or against the proposition—”The constitutional amendment to establish English as the official language of Texas and to require that official acts of government be taken in English.”

22nd

Former Hitler Youth author angers both right, left Comparisons between Nazi leader, the puppet draws strong reaction
posted by WorldNetDaily

A new book by a former Hitler Youth, which condemns totalitarian fascism and communism, has drawn angry reactions from both the American political left and the political right. The book is Defeating the Totalitarian Lie: A Former Hitler Youth Warns America by Hilmar von Campe. In an appearance on Michael Savage’s nationally syndicated talk-radio program, von Campe pointed to similarities between the rise of totalitarianism under Adolf Hitler and the current social and political trends inside the United States, specifically mentioning the policies of the puppet as being similar to national socialism, which von Campe lived through.

On the right, Michael C. Moynihan writing for Reason Online downplayed any parallelism, writing, “Now that Naomi Wolf‘s breathless tale of America’s collapse into fascism has been further repudiated (unless, that is, Hitlerian countries routinely elect people like the puppet), perhaps it’s time for the hysterics on the right to tremble in fear at the forthcoming machtergreifung. First, the psychopathic radio host and ‘world famous herbal expert’ Michael Savage hosts former Hitler Youth member Hilmar von Campe ‘to discuss similarities between the puppet and the rise of totalitarianism under Hitler. Not much you can say to that, except to point out that beyond the big, excited crowds, there are absolutely no similarities.”

On the left, Mother Jones was quick to join in, referring to von Campe as “one of a bevy of conservative authors who in the weeks before the election whipped up the fear that the puppet was the modern-day version of the Nazi dictator. In an Oct. 28 WorldNetDaily column, he wrote, ‘Socialist Hitler destroyed free society in a few months. Socialist puppet is close to his steppingstone.’” Mother Jones called Savage “an over-the-top purveyor of extreme rhetoric” who, in their opinion, was not breaking new ground by scheduling von Campe as a guest. “But it’s a signal the say-anything right is not dumping the puppet-as-Hitler argument,” they continued.

“Will this stuff play even to the GOP base? This sort of talk, if it becomes widespread in the months and years ahead, is more likely to separate the brimming-with-resentment conservatives from more responsible Republicans—which certainly won’t make the GOP’s repair job any easier. But politics aside, the continued use of this hysterical rhetoric raises this question—Do these agitators who liken the historic 2008 election to Hitler’s putsch hate America?”

In the lead up to the presidential election, Media Matters placed von Campe alongside radio host Mark Levin and other media figures who allegedly compared the puppet to Hitler or the Nazis. Other Liberals are fighting mad about the puppet-socialism connection in the WorldNetDaily article “Ex-Hitler youth compares the puppet to Nazi rise”, calling it “the most controversial essay in the final week of the election season.” Evidence that the puppet was a socialist emerged in the days leading up to the election, revealing that he “belonged to a socialist political party that sought to elect members to public office with the aim of moving the Democratic Party far leftward to ultimately form a new political party with a socialist agenda.

The attack by liberals on von Campe for pointing out how the puppet’s political views echo this Nazi Germany agenda has not deterred the former Hitler Youth from speaking out. “Every day brings this nation closer to a Nazi-style totalitarian abyss,” he warns. “Today in America we are witnessing a repeat performance of the tragedy of 1933 when an entire nation let itself be led like a lamb to the Socialist slaughterhouse. This time, the end of freedom is inevitable unless America rises to her mission and destiny.” As a person who survived the nightmare of Adolf Hitler, von Campe believes he carries a sober responsibility to warn Americans how quickly free society can be destroyed through socialist ideology.

25th

Official Seals Scandal
post by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

His majesty, king puppet not only created his own official seal for his candidacy so he could feed his ego and look more Presidential, he also invented a fake Office of the President Elect and, of course, made an official seal for that nonsense, too. UPDATE—Mar. 4—the puppet wants an official seal for his stimulus plan so signs can go up by road projects!

October 2008

9th

Farrakhan on The Pupet—’The Messiah is absolutely speaking’ Puppet has captured the youth,’ will bring about ‘universal change’
posted by WorldNetDaily

Nation of Islam leader Louis Farrakhan, another powerful Chicago-based political figure associated with the Rev. Jeremiah Wright and other long-time associates of Democratic Party presidential candidate the puppet, is leaving no doubt about what he thinks of the leader in the campaign for the White House. He says when the puppet talks “the Messiah is absolutely speaking.” Addressing a large crowd behind a podium Feb. 24 with a Nation of Islam Savior’s Day 2008 sign, Farrakhan proclaims, “You are the instruments that God† is going to use to bring about universal change, and that is why the puppet has captured the youth. And he has involved young people in a political process that they didn’t care anything about. That’s a sign. When the Messiah speaks, the youth will hear, and the Messiah is absolutely speaking.”

“Brothers and sisters,” Farrakhan said, “The puppet to me, is a herald of the Messiah. The puppet is like the trumpet that alerts you something new, something better is on the way.” Farrakhan points out that the man Nation of Islam followers refer to as “the Savior,” Fard Muhammad, had a black father and a white mother, just as the puppet did “A black man with a white mother became a savior to us,” he said. “A black man with a white mother could turn out to be one who can lift America from her fall

“Would God allow the puppet to be president of a country that has been so racist, so evil in its treatment of Hispanics, native Americans, blacks?” he asked. “Would God do something like that? Yeah. Of course he would. That’s to show you that the stone that the builders rejected has become the headstone of the corner. This is a sign to you. It’s the time of our rise. It’s the time that we should take our place. The future is all about you.” Farrakhan suggested he would keep a low profile in the campaign, despite his enthusiasm for the puppet. “That’s why you have never heard me make any comment,” he explained. “I love that brother, and I want to see that brother successful. I don’t want to say anything that would hurt that brother, and I don’t want them to use me or the Nation of Islam.” Returning to the theme that the puppet is a mystical figure, Farrakhan said, he “is not the Messiah for sure, but anytime he gives you a sign of uniting races, ethnic groups, ideologies, religions and makes people feel a sense of oneness, that’s not necessarily Satan’s work, that is, I believe, the work of God.”

He went on to point out that when religious scholars talk about Christ† or the Islamic Mahdi, they never talk in racial terms—again, pointing to the puppet’s mixed racial background. WND previously reported a website called “Is the puppet the Messiah?” captured the wave of euphoria that followed the Democratic senator’s remarkable rise. The site is topped by an the puppet quote strategically ripped from a Jan. 7 speech at Dartmouth College just before the New Hampshire Primary in which he told students, “… a light will shine through that window, a beam of light will come down upon you, you will experience an epiphany, and you will suddenly realize that you must go to the polls and vote” for the puppet.

MSNBC anchor Chris Matthews is among the many members of the media enraptured by the puppet, admitting he felt a “thrill going up my leg” listening to an the puppet speech. Columnist Mark Morford of the San Francisco Chronicle writes that the puppet has a charisma that goes beyond “his youthful vigor, or handsomeness, or even inspiring rhetoric.”

“Bill Clinton, with all his effortless, winking charm, didn’t have what the puppet has, which is a sort of powerful luminosity, a unique high-vibration integrity,” Morford says. “Dismiss it all you like, but I’ve heard from far too many enormously smart, wise, spiritually attuned people who’ve been intuitively blown away by the puppet’s presence—not speeches, not policies, but sheer presence—to say it’s just a clever marketing ploy, a slick gambit carefully orchestrated by hotshot campaign organizers who, once the puppet gets into office, will suddenly turn from perky optimists to vile soul-sucking lobbyist whores, with the puppet as their suddenly evil, cackling overlord.

WND also reported when talk radio host Rush Limbaugh criticized Democrats who were comparing the puppet to Jesus† and Gov. Sarah Palin to Pontius Pilate. “I know Jesus Christ†. I pray to Jesus Christ† all the time,” said Limbaugh.” I study what Jesus Christ† did and said all the time, and let me tell you something, the puppet, you are no Jesus Christ†.” He also attacked the puppet ‘s stances for abortion and sex education for children in kindergarten, saying, “I can’t find any such references to Jesus† promoting infanticide nor do I find any references to Jesus Christ† suggesting sex education be taught to 4- and 5-year-olds, but I’m still looking in the New Testament and I’ll let you all know if I come up with anything.”

Democrats, including party strategist Donna Brazile and Rep. Steve Cohen, D-Tenn., made nearly identical biblical comparisons of the characters in this presidential election, which Limbaugh traced back to a Sept. 4 posting on a Washington blog. “The puppet was a community organizer like Jesus†,” Cohen said during a one-minute speech on the floor of the U.S. House yesterday. “Pontius Pilate was a governor.”

15th

Biden Doesn’t Know How to Count!
post by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

[Another Gaffe for Joe Biden.] Fox News reports—When criticizing former GOP nominee John McCain in Athens, Ohio on Oct. 15, Biden said, “Look, John’s last-minute economic plan does nothing to tackle the number-one job facing the middle class, and it happens to be, as Barack says, a three-letter word—jobs. J-O-B-S, jobs.”

20th

Scandal—Frank Marshall Davis
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

National Review—The press refuses to delve into the puppet’s radicalism, his leftist revolutionary collaboration with self-identified communists [like] Frank Marshall Davis, who has confessed to having sex with children, sadomasochism, bondage and practicing a wide array of deviant sexual activities. The puppet identifies Davis only as “Frank” in his book. The National Enquirer says Davis “confessed to having sex with children, sadomasochism, bondage and practicing a wide array of deviant sexual activities. In Dreams from My Father, the puppet wrote—“He would read us poetry whenever we stopped by his house, sharing whiskey with Gramps out of an emptied jelly jar. As the night wore on, the two of them would solicit my help in composing dirty limericks.”

The puppet described being counseled by Frank often and recalled drinking whiskey with him. Since Frank Davis has been identified as the author of Sex Rebel: Black, the puppet has been extremely secretive about the true nature of his experience with the self-admitted deviant. The Honolulu Advertiser reports—“I have a lot of expectations, a lot of hope, and I expect to see a lot of change,” said the daughter of Davis, a black journalist, poet and friend of the puppet’s maternal grandfather. “I feel truly proud to be an American,” said Davis’ granddaughter. “I never have before.”  [Sounds like the puppet's wife!]

26th

Terrorist Scandal—Bill Ayers
post by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

Three times before the cock crows, the puppet denies having a ‘relationship’ with Bill Ayers. The puppet started his political career in Ayers’ home and served on a foundation’s education board with Ayers. Ayers is a home-grown terrorist and founder of the Weather Underground which bombed the Pentagon and a judge’s home. His terrorist wife also used to work with the puppet’s wife. However, the puppet maintains Terrorist Ayers is “just a guy in my neighborhood.” UPDATE—June 9, 2009—and this from World Net Daily.

29th

Terrorist Scandal—Rashid Khalidi
post by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

Another terrorist friend, Khalidi was an advisor to the PLO. The puppet dined with him, served on a board with him, and Khalidi held fundraisers for the puppet. Jesse Jackson, Sr. promised one audience that the Jewish influence on American foreign policy would soon come to an end with the puppet victory.

Franklin Raines Scandal
post by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

This former Chairman and CEO of Fannie Mae [the ones who got us into the housing mess] was an advisor to the puppet on mortgage and housing issues during the campaign. McCain ads pointed out the foolishness of the puppet picking Raines.

30th

Family Scandal—His Aunt
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

His aunt is here in the United States as an illegal! He does nothing to help her.

31st

Berg. v. Obama, case 08-4340
at http://www.fec.gov/law/litigation

Case No. 08-4340
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Phillip Berg, Appellant v. the puppet, et, al., Appellees

Response of Appellees Senator puppet and Democratic National Committee to Appellant’s Emergency Motion John P. Lavelle, Jr., Attorney I.D. Pa. 54279, 1735 Market Street, 51st Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19103-7599, (215)864-8603, (215) 864-9125 (Fax), lavellei@bal1ardspahr.corn

Robert F. Bauer, General Counsel, the puppet for America PERKINS COIE, 607 Fourteenth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20005-2003, Telephone: (202) 628-6600, Fax:(202)434-1690, RBauer(S),perkincoie.com, Attorneys for Appellees the puppet and Democratic National Committee Appellant Philip Berg has appealed from the decision of the District Court dismissing his complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Memorandum and Order, Berg v. the puppet, Civ. No. 08-cv-4083 (E.D. Pa. filed Oct. 24, 2008)(“District Court Decision”), attached hereto as Exhibit 1. Berg has now filed an “Emergency Motion for an Immediate Injunction to Stay the Presidential Election of November 4, 2008 Pending Resolution of the Petitioner’s Appeal” (“Emergency Motion”).

Pursuant to FRAP 27(a)(3) and this Court’s Order of October 30, 2008, appellees the puppet and the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) hereby respond to the Emergency Motion. The Emergency Motion should be denied for three reasons.

First, Berg’s Emergency Motion is effectively a new original case, seeking directly from this Court relief not sought below and based largely on facts and legal grounds not raised in his complaints. Accordingly this Court lacks jurisdiction over the Emergency Motion. The All-Writs Act does not afford any basis for jurisdiction in this case. Second, Berg failed to comply with Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, requiring that he move first in the district court for any order granting an injunction while an appeal is pending. Third, there is no possibility that Berg will prevail on the merits. Not only are Berg’s allegations patently false, but, as the District Court correctly found, he lacks standing to bring the action and there is no federal cause of action in any event for enforcement of the constitutional provision he invokes.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE
On August 21, 2008, appellant Philip Berg filed a complaint in the District Court alleging (falsely) that the puppet is not a “natural born citizen” and is therefore ineligible to serve as President of the U.S. under Article II, section 1, clause 4 of the Constitution, the Natural Born Citizen Clause. Berg sought a declaration that the puppet is ineligible to run for President and a permanent injunction enjoining him from running for President and enjoining the DNC from nominating him. On September 24, 2008, defendants Senator Obama and the Democratic National Committee (“DNC”) filed a motion to dismiss, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. On October 6, 2008, Berg filed a First Amended Complaint, adding several new defendants and asserting causes of action under the Civil Rights Acts, 42 U.S.C. §§1983 and 1985, the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 as amended, 2 U.S.C. §§431 et seq., the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. §552 and the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. §1481(b). In his First Amended Complaint, Berg sought the same relier as that sought in the original complaint and, additionally, an order compelling the FEC and the U.S. Senate Rules Committee to conduct an investigation into Senator puppet’s citizenship status and an injunction barring the Pennsylvania Department of State and the DNC from placing Senator puppet’s name on the presidential general election ballot. On October 20, 2008, defendants the puppet and the DNC filed a motion to dismiss the First Amended Complaint. That motion was granted by the District Court on October 24, 2008. See Exhibit 1 hereto. The District Court found that Berg lacked standing to assert any claim under the Natural Born Citizen Clause and that his complaint did not state a claim under any of the other statutory provision he invoked.

Berg has now filed his Emergency Motion, again alleging falsely that the puppet was not born in the United States, setting forth various other allegations about the Senator, and requesting an injunction “to stay the Presidential Election of November 4, 2008 pending the resolution of Petitioner’s Appeal.” Emergency Motion at 17.

ARGUMENT
The Emergency Motion should be denied. First, this Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the Emergency Motion. It is not a motion for stay of the judgment or order of the District Court pending appeal and does not address the merits of the District Court’s decision at all. Nor does it request that the relief sought from the District Court be granted during the pendency of the appeal. Rather, the Emergency Motion seeks a form of relief which was not requested at all in either the original Complaint or First Amended Complaint, namely, an order enjoining the conduct of the Presidential general election next Tuesday, November 4, 2008. Further, the Emergency Motion includes a number of factual allegations not included in either the original Complaint or First Amended Complaint and not otherwise raised in the District Court. See Emergency Motion fl 4, 5, 6, 19-25.

Among other things, attached to the Emergency Motion are two affidavits, one from a “Bishop Ron McRae” and another from a “Reverend Kiori,” both executed after the District Court issued its decision. In these circumstances, this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the Emergency Motion. The Emergency Motion is an original action seeking relief not sought in the court below and based substantially on different factual grounds. In the absence of a special statutory basis for jurisdiction, however, a Court of Appeals “cannot take evidence or hear matters initially.” In re Montes, 677 F.2d 415, 416 (5th Cir. 1982). Nor does the All-Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. §1651(a), relied upon by Berg (Emergency Motion at 11), provide any basis for the relief sought in the Emergency Motion. Relief under the All-Writs Act is not available unless the applicant has “no other ‘adequate means to attain the [desired] relief…“In re School Asbestos Litigation, 921 F.2d 1310, 1314 (3d Cir. 1990), quoting Kerr v. U.S. District Court, 426 U.S. 394, 403 (1976). Such a showing cannot be made where the petitioner has “made no effort to secure relief from the trial court involved….”//! reMontes, 677 F.2dat416.

To be sure, this Court may also issue a writ in order to preserve its own jurisdiction over an appeal. E.g., United States v. Rowlands, 451 F.3d 173 (3d Cir. 2006). Berg has not made any showing, however, that enjoining the Presidential election is necessary in order for this Court to review the District Court’s ruling that Berg lacked standing to assert his constitutional claim and that his complaint failed to state a claim under any of the other statutory provisions invoked in his complaint. Second, Berg also failed to comply with FRAP 8(a)(1) and (2) by failing to seek the requested relief first from the District Court. “Application for a stay may be made in the first instance to the court of appeals only when application to the district court for the relief sought is not practicable. Since the [appellant] has not applied to the district court for a stay we cannot consider such a motion.” United States ex. Rel. Barnwell v. Rundle, 461 F.2d 768, 769 (3d Cir. 1972).

Finally, the factors regulating issuance of a stay or injunction pending appeal dictate denial of the Emergency Motion. Those factors are “(1) whether the stay applicant has made a strong showing that he is likely to succeed on the merits; (2) whether the applicant will be irreparably injured absent a stay; (3) whether issuance of the stay will substantially injure the other parties interested in the proceeding; and (4) where the public interest lies.” Hilton v. Braunskill, 481 U.S. 770, 776 (1987). Here there is no possibility whatsoever, let alone a likelihood, that Berg will succeed on the merits. As the District Court correctly concluded, Berg does not have standing under Article III to bring a claim under the Natural Born Citizen Clause. District Court Decision at 9-17. Standing requires an injury in fact that is concrete and particularized Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560 (1992). It is well established that a “voter fails to present an injury in fact when the alleged harm is abstract and widely shared or is only derivative of a harm experienced by a candidate.” Crist v. Com ‘n on Presidential Debates, 262 F.3d 193, 194 (2d Cir. 2001)(per curiam). For that reason, a voter does not have standing to challenge the qualifications of a presidential candidate under the Constitution. Hollander v. McCain, No. 08-0099, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 56729 (D.N.H. 2008); Jones v. Bush, 122 F. Supp. 2d 7133 (N.D. Tex. 2000). With respect to the other causes of action asserted by Berg in his First Amended Complaint, it is clear, and the District Court correctly held, that no cause of action lies under the Civil Rights Acts, §§1983, 1985 or 1986; the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended; the Freedom of Information Act; the Immigration or Nationality Act; or under theory of promissory estoppel. Berg does not, in his Emergency Motion, take issue with the District Court’s rulings that none of these theories affords Berg any basis for the relief he sought.

CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth above, the Emergency Motion should be denied. John P. Lavelle, Jr., Attorney I.D. Pa. 54279, BALLARD SPAHR ANDREWS & INGERSOLL, LLP, 1735 Market Street, 51st Floor Philadelphia, PA 19103-7599, (215)864-8603, (215) 864-9125 (Fax), lavellej (ajballardspahr.com Of Counsel: Joseph E. Sandler, General Counsel, Democratic National Committee SANDLER, REIFF & YOUNG, P.C., 300 M Street, S.E. #1102, Washington, D.C. 20003, Telephone: (202)479-1111, Fax:(202)479-1115 Robert F. Bauer, General Counsel, the puppet for America, PERKINS COIE, 607 Fourteenth Street, N.W.,Washington, D.C. 20005-2003 Telephone: (202) 628-6600, Fax:(202)434-1690, RBauer(ajperkincoie.com, Attorneys for Appellees, Senator Barack Obama and Democratic National Committee

FED.R.APP.P. 32f CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
I, John P. Lavelle, Jr., Esquire, the attorney for Defendants the puppet and Democratic National Committee, hereby certify that the foregoing Response of Appellees the puppet and Democratic National Committee to Appellant’s Emergency Motion complies with the type-volume limitation set forth in Rule 32(a)(7)(B) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. The total number of words in the foregoing Brief is 1,495. I John P. Lavelle, Jr.

CERTIFICATE OF BAR MEMBERSHIP I, John P. Lavelle, Jr., Esquire, hereby certify that I am admitted in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals. i John P. Lavelle, Jr. Dated: October 31, 2008 CERTIFICATION OF IDENTICAL FILING AND VIRUS CHECK I hereby certify that the text of the E-Brief and hard copies of the brief are identical. I further certify that a virus check was performed by the McAfee VirusScan Enterprise 8.5i, and is free of viruses according to that program.  John P. Lavelle, Jr. Dated: October 31, 2008 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, John P. Lavelle, Esquire, hereby certify that two copies of the foregoing Response of Appellees the puppet and Democratic National Committee to Appellant’s Emergency Motion was served upon the following counsel for Appellant by first class mail, postage prepaid, this 31st day of October, 2008—Philip J. Berg, Esquire, 555 Andorra Glen Court, Suite 12, Lafayette Hill, PA 19444-2531, Benjamin A. Streeter, III, Esquire, The Federal Election Commission (FEC), 999 E. Street, NW, Washington, DC 20463

September 2008

1st

Biden Not Sure what he is running for!
post by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

[Another Gaffe for Joe Biden.]

Fox News reports—Biden said he was running for President—not Vice-Presidentduring a round-table discussion in Scranton, Pa. “Today is the moment for me as a United States Senator running for President to put aside the National politics and focus on what’s happening down there,” Biden said. [You lost the big prize, pal. Didn’t anyone tell you?]

4th

Biden Not Sure who Sarah Palin is!
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

[Another Gaffe for Joe Biden.]

Fox News reports—Biden mistakenly referred to Alaska Governor Sarah Palin as the Lieutenant Governor of her State during a town hall meeting…at George Mason University in Manassas, Va. “I heard a very, by the way I mean this sincerely, a very strong and a very good political speech from a Lieutenant Governor of Alaska who I think is going to be very formidable, very formidable not only in the campaign but in the debate,” Biden said.

7th

Puppet Gaffe—Calls Himself Muslim
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

Time Magazine—“What I was suggesting—you’re absolutely right that John McCain has not talked about my Muslim faith…”the puppet on ABC’s This Week. Two months before the election, the puppet discussed with George Stephanopoulos the false rumors that he is a Moslem and addressed the fact that John McCain had denied spreading the rumors. The puppet is (and was) a Christian. Stephanopoulos jumped in to correct him, and the candidate quickly clarified. The puppet is not a Moslem.

10th

Biden says Hillary is more Qualified than He is to be V.P.!
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

[Another Gaffe for Joe Biden.]

Fox News reports at a town hall meeting in Nashua, N.H.,—Biden said, “Hillary Clinton is as qualified or more qualified than I am to be Vice-President of the United States of America. Quite frankly, it might have been a better pick than me.” [Quite frankly, it would have been.]

12th

Biden Wheelchair Gaffe
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

[Another Gaffe for Joe Biden.]

Fox News reports—during a speech in Columbia, Mo., Biden called for Missouri State Sen. Chuck Graham, who is wheelchair-bound, to stand up. “Oh, God†, love ya,” Biden said, after realizing his mistake. “What am I talking about?” [None of us is ever sure, Mr. Biden.]

16th

The puppet’s Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac Connection
by John Gibson of Fox News

Lehman Brothers collapse is traced back to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two big mortgage banks that got a Federal bailout a few weeks ago. Freddie and Fannie used huge lobbying budgets and political contributions to keep regulators off their backs. A group called the Center for Responsive Politics keeps track of which politicians get Fannie and Freddie political contributions. The top three U.S. Senators getting big Fannie and Freddie political bucks were Democrats and No. 2 is the puppet. Now remember, he’s only been in the Senate four years, but he still managed to grab the No. 2 spot ahead of John Kerry—decades in the Senate—and Chris Dodd, who is Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee.

Fannie and Freddie have been creations of the Congressional Democrats and the Clinton White House, designed to make mortgages available to more people and, as it turns out, some people who couldn’t afford them. Fannie and Freddie have also been places for big Washington Democrats to go to work in the semi-private sector and pocket millions. The Clinton administration’s White House Budget Director Franklin Raines ran Fannie and collected $50 million. Jamie Gorelick—Clinton Justice Department official—worked for Fannie and took home $26 million. Big Democrat Jim Johnson, recently on the puppet’s V.P. search committee, has hauled in millions from his Fannie Mae CEO job.

Tries to Delay Troop Withdrawal from Iraq
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

New York Post—Campaigning…for a speedy withdrawal of U.S. troops,…the puppet tried in private to persuade Iraqi leaders to delay an agreement on a draw-down of the American military presence. Iraqi Foreign Minister Hoshyar Zebari says the puppet demanded a delay in July 2008. “He asked why we were not prepared to delay an agreement until after the U.S. elections and the formation of a new administration in Washington.”

The puppet insisted Congress should be involved in negotiations on the status of U.S. troops—and that it was in the interests of both sides not to have an agreement negotiated by the Bush administration in its “state of weakness and political confusion.” Though the puppet claims the U.S. presence is “illegal,” he suddenly remembered that Americans troops were in Iraq within the legal framework of a U.N. mandate. His advice was that, rather than reach an accord with the “weakened Bush administration,” Iraq should seek an extension of the U.N. mandate. The puppet has made many contradictory statements with regard to Iraq. His latest position is that U.S. combat troops should be out by 2010. Yet, his effort to delay an agreement would make that withdrawal deadline impossible to meet.

22nd

Biden Makes up History
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

[Another Gaffe for Joe Biden.]

Fox News reports—In a CBS interview, Biden misspoke when he said Franklin D. Roosevelt was President when the stock market crashed in 1929. “When the stock market crashed, Franklin D. Roosevelt got on the television and didn’t just talk about the, you know, the prices of greed, he said, ‘Look, here’s what happened.’” [Herbert Hoover—not Roosevelt—was President in 1929. Television had not yet been invented in 1929!]

August 2008

8th

A Petition for the Impeachment of Senator Puppet
post by Impeach, Expel the Puppet

To The Congress of the United States

Whereas: Senator puppet is an admitted Illegal drug user and is believed to have used illegal drugs as recently as November 1999 or more recently. The puppet has maintained contact with other admitted illegal drug users. Whereas: Senator puppet has maintained regular contact with known criminals such as Antoin (Tony) Rezko and other criminal elements in Chicago and Illinois. The puppet has conducted business with these criminals and received campaign donations from them. The puppet was compelled to return an estimated $250,000 in donations related to Tony Rezko. Whereas: Senator puppet has consistently lied about his contact with convicted criminal Tony Rezko. The Tony Rezko corruption trial revealed that FBI mole John Thomas helped investigators “build a record of repeat visits to the old offices of Rezko and former business partner Daniel Mahru’s Rezmar Corp., at 853 N. Elston, by Blagojevich and the puppet during 2004 and 2005″ according to the February 10, 2008 Chicago Sun-Times.

Whereas: Senator puppet has engaged in unscrupulous business practices, in particular with Mr. Robert Blackwell. The puppet received an $8,000 per month “legal retainer” from Mr. Blackwell for a total of $112,000 and reported the income through his law firm in a manner not unlike money laundering. The puppet, along with the puppet campaign manager Dan Shomon, procured $320,000 in state grants for Blackwell’s company Killerspin. Blackwell companies contributed over $32,000 to the puppet campaign in 2007.

Whereas: Senator puppet used the office of IL Senator to facilitate the vote rigging in Chicago as chairman of the Illinois Senate Health and Human Services Committee. The puppet pushed legislation in Senate Bill 1332 to reduce the number of members of the Health Facilities Planning Board from 15 to 9. The puppet did conspire with Stuart Levine, Tony Rezko and Rod Blogojevich to rig the committee and was rewarded with campaign contributions. The new members appointed included 3 doctors who contributed to the puppet. On April 21, 2004, Stuart Levine explicitly advised Dr. Robert Weinstein, who is now indicted, of Tony Rezko’s role in manipulating the Planning Board’s vote. Whereas: Senator puppet has engaged in lies and deception about his past. The puppet lied about his contact level with convicted criminal Tony Rezko, the amounts and sources of campaign contributions and encounters with the law. A complaint has been filed with the Bar Association of Illinois alleging that the puppet did not answer truthfully all questions on the application to the bar.

Whereas: Senator puppet has invoked the FOIA in Illinois when it was politically expedient and ignored or violated the FOIA at other times. In the Illinois Senate proceedings regarding Senate Bill 1416, the puppet pleads the importance of businesses bidding on state contracts having improved access to FOIA data. When later questioned about his records during his term in the IL Senate, the puppet gave evasive answers or refused to supply records. Whereas: The First Amendment provides a right for the people “to petition the government for a redress of grievances.” Precedents exist for impeachment and expulsion of a U.S. Senator. Senator William Blount was impeached by the House on July 7, 1797 and expelled by the Senate the next day.

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that we, the people, Undersigned, being citizens of the United States and residents in the Cities and States so indicated, HEREBY Demand that the Congress of the United States begin immediate impeachment and/or expulsion proceedings against Senator puppet. Addendum: Petition to Impeach Senator puppet

21st

Born in the U.S.A. (The truth about the puppet’s birth certificate?)
by Jess Henig, with Joe Miller of factcheck.org

[Note: On this website which was annotated in the U.S. District Court of District of Columbia case, seems to only have the puppet’s birth certificate on file. Odd! It also tries to appear to be a legitimate Government website, and I’m no expert, but it looks like a regular website made by a company not a government.]

Summary In June, the the puppet campaign released a digitally scanned image of his birth certificate to quell speculative charges that he might not be a natural-born citizen. But the image prompted more blog-based skepticism about the document’s authenticity. And recently, author Jerome Corsi, whose book attacks the puppet, said in a TV interview that the birth certificate the campaign has is “fake.” We beg to differ. FactCheck.org staffers have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship. Claims that the document lacks a raised seal or a signature are false. Our conclusion—the puppet was born in the U.S.A. just as he has always said. UPDATE—Nov. 1—The director of Hawaii’s Department of Health confirmed Oct. 31 that the puppet was born in Honolulu.

Analysis UPDATE—Nov.1—The Associated Press quoted Chiyome Fukino as saying that both she and the Registrar of Vital Statistics, Alvin Onaka, have personally verified that the Health Department holds the puppet’s original birth certificate. Fukino also was quoted by several other news organizations. The Honolulu Advertiser quoted Fukino as saying the agency had been bombarded by requests, and that the Registrar of Statistics had even been called in at home in the middle of the night. Honolulu Advertiser, Nov. 1 2008—“This has gotten ridiculous,” State Health Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino said yesterday. “There are plenty of other, important things to focus on, like the economy, taxes, energy.” Will this be enough to quiet the doubters? “I hope so,” Fukino said. “We need to get some work done.” Fukino said she has “personally seen and verified that the Hawaii State Department of Health has Sen. puppet’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with State policies and procedures.” Since we first wrote about the puppet’s birth certificate on June 16, speculation on his citizenship has continued apace. Some claim that the puppet posted a fake birth certificate to his Web page. That charge leaped from the blogosphere to the mainstream media earlier this week when Jerome Corsi, author of a book attacking the puppet, repeated the claim in an Aug. 15 interview with Steve Doocy on Fox News.

Corsi: Well, what would be really helpful is if the puppet would release primary documents like his birth certificate. The campaign has a false, fake birth certificate posted on their website. How is anybody supposed to really piece together his life?
Doocy: What do you mean they have a “false birth certificate” on their website?
Corsi: The original birth certificate of the puppet has never been released, and the campaign refuses to release it.
Doocy: Well, couldn’t it just be a State of Hawaii-produced duplicate?
Corsi: No, it’s a—there’s been good analysis of it on the internet, and it’s been shown to have watermarks from Photoshop. It’s a fake document that’s on the website right now, and the original birth certificate the campaign refuses to produce.
Corsi: Isn’t the only skeptic claiming that the document is a forgery. Among the most frequent objections we saw on forums, blogs and e-mails are:

  • The birth certificate doesn’t have a raised seal.
  • It isn’t signed.
  • No creases from folding are evident in the scanned version.
  • In the zoomed-in view, there’s a strange halo around the letters.
  • The certificate number is blacked out.
  • The date bleeding through from the back seems to say “2007,” but the document wasn’t released until 2008.
  • The document is a “certification of birth,” not a “certificate of birth.”
  • Recently FactCheck representatives got a chance to spend some time with the birth certificate, and we can attest to the fact that it is real and three-dimensional and resides at the puppet headquarters in Chicago. We can assure readers that the certificate does bear a raised seal, and that it’s stamped on the back by Hawaii State Registrar Alvin T. Onaka (who uses a signature stamp rather than signing individual birth certificates). We even brought home a few photographs.
  • The certificate has all the elements the State Department requires for proving citizenship to obtain a U.S. passport—full name, the full name of parent(s), date and place of birth, sex, date the birth record was filed, and the seal or other certification of the official custodian of such records. The names, date and place of birth, and filing date are all evident on the scanned version, and you can see the seal above.

The document is a ‘certification of birth,’ also known as a short-form birth certificate. The long form is drawn up by the hospital and includes additional information such as birth weight and parents’ hometowns. The short form is printed by the State and draws from a database with fewer details. The Hawaii Department of Health’s Birth Record Request Form does not give the option to request a photocopy of your long-form birth certificate, but their short form has enough information to be acceptable to the State Department. We tried to ask the Hawaii DOH why they only offer the short form, among other questions, but they have not given a response. The scan released by the campaign shows halos around the black text, making it look (to some) as though the text might have been pasted on top of an image of security paper. But the document itself has no such halos, nor do the close-up photos we took of it. We conclude that the halo seen in the image produced by the campaign is a digital artifact from the scanning process.

We asked the puppet campaign about the date stamp and the blacked-out certificate number. The certificate is stamped June 2007 because that’s when Hawaii officials produced it for the campaign, which requested that document and “all the records we could get our hands on” according to spokesperson Shauna Daly. The campaign didn’t release its copy until 2008, after speculation began to appear on the Internet questioning the puppet’s citizenship. The campaign then rushed to release the document, and the rush is responsible for the blacked-out certificate number. Says Shauna—[We] couldn’t get someone on the phone in Hawaii to tell us whether the number represented some secret information, and we erred on the side of blacking it out. Since then we’ve found out it’s pretty irrelevant for the outside world. The document we looked at did have a certificate number; it is 151 1961-010641.

Some of the conspiracy theories that have circulated about the puppet are quite imaginative. One conservative blogger suggested that the campaign might have obtained a valid Hawaii birth certificate, soaked it in solvent, then reprinted it with the puppet’s information. Of course, this anonymous blogger didn’t have access to the actual document and presents this as just one possible scenario without any evidence that such a thing actually happened or is even feasible

We also note that so far none of those questioning the authenticity of the document have produced a shred of evidence that the information on it is incorrect. Instead, some speculate that somehow, maybe, he was born in another country and doesn’t meet the Constitution‘s requirement that the President be a “natural-born citizen.” We think our colleagues at PolitiFact.com, who also dug into some of these loopy theories, put it pretty well—It is possible that the puppet conspired his way to the precipice of the world’s biggest job, involving a vast network of people and government agencies over decades of lies. Anything’s possible. But step back and look at the overwhelming evidence to the contrary and your sense of what’s reasonable has to take over.

In fact, the conspiracy would need to be even deeper than our colleagues realized. In late July, a researcher looking to dig up dirt on the puppet instead found a birth announcement that had been published in the Honolulu Advertiser on Sunday, Aug. 13, 1961—The announcement was posted by a pro-Hillary Clinton blogger who grudgingly concluded that the puppet likely was born Aug. 4, 1961 in Honolulu. Of course, it’s distantly possible that the puppet’s grandparents may have planted the announcement just in case their grandson needed to prove his U.S. citizenship in order to run for President someday. We suggest that those who choose to go down that path should first equip themselves with a high-quality tinfoil hat. The evidence is clear—the puppet was born in the U.S.A.

UPDATE—Aug. 26—We received responses to some of our questions from the Hawaii Department of Health. They couldn’t tell us anything about their security paper, but they did answer another frequently-raised question—why is the puppet’s father’s race listed as African? Kurt Tsue at the DOH told us that father’s race and mother’s race are supplied by the parents, and that “we accept what the parents self identify themselves to be.” We consider it reasonable to believe that the puppet, Sr., would have thought of and reported himself as African. It’s certainly not the slam dunk some readers have made it out to be. When we asked about the security borders, which look different from some other examples of Hawaii certifications of live birth, Kurt said, “The borders are generated each time a certified copy is printed. A citation located on the bottom left hand corner of the certificate indicates which date the form was revised.” He also confirmed that the information in the short form birth certificate is sufficient to prove of citizenship for “all reasonable purposes.”

Sources

  • United States Department of State. “Application for a U.S. Passport.” Accessed 20 Aug. 2008.
  • State of Hawaii Department of Health. “Request for Certified Copy of Birth Record.” Accessed 20 Aug. 2008.
  • Hollyfield, Amy. “The puppet’s Birth Certificate: Final Chapter.” Politifact.com. 27 Jun. 2008.
  • The Associated Press. “State declares the puppet birth certificate genuine” 31 Oct 2008.
  • Nakaso, Dan. “The puppet’s certificate of birth OK, state says; Health Director Issues voucher in response to ‘ridiculous’ barrage” Honolulu Advertiser 1 Nov 2008.

UPDATE—July 28, 2009 Fox News—“State officials in Hawaii on Monday said they have once again checked and confirmed that President the puppet was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen, and therefore meets a key constitutional requirement for being president. They hoped to stem a recent surge in the number of inquiries about the puppet’s birthplace. “I … have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaii State Department of Health verifying the puppet was born in Hawaii and is a natural-born American citizen,” Health Director Dr. Chiyome Fukino said in a brief statement. “I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.”

27th

Biden actually thinks He and the puppet are running against Bush!
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

[Another Gaffe for Joe Biden, who doesn’t even know who his opponent is!] Fox News reports—Biden referred to John McCain as “George” during his Vice-Presidential acceptance speech on Aug. 27, 2008, at the Democratic National Convention in Denver, Co. “Freudian slip, folks, Freudian slip,” he explained.

28th

Biden Not Sure who his Running Mate is!
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

[Another Gaffe for Joe Biden.] Fox News reportsDuring his first campaign rally with the puppet as his Vice-Presidential running mate…Biden introduced the puppet by saying, “A man I’m proud to call my friend. A man who will be the next President of the United States—the puppet America!” [Not so fast pal. The puppet isn’t America, yet.]

Family Scandal—Half Brother
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

While preaching at his acceptance speech about looking out for your brother, the puppet leaves his own half-brother to live in a hut in Africa. “Change we can believe in” apparently is in the family values category.

July 2008

2nd

Family Scandal—Broken Promise to Kenya
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

Evening Standardthe puppet promised help for a school in his grandmother’s village but has not given any. “I have said I will assist the school and I will. [Although the puppet did not say ‘financial’ there was no doubt among us teachers that is what he meant.] Evening Standard –We interpreted his words as meaning he would help fund the school, either personally or by raising sponsors or both…10 of the students are the puppet’s relatives…While the puppet had a new Rezko house, he let his own grandmother down. Sarah the puppet confidently told reporters before his visit, “When he comes down here, he will change the face of the school and, believe me, our poverty in Kogelo will be a thing of the past.” She lives in a small brick house with no running water, a tin roof and roving chickens.

25th

Banking Committee Lie
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

Newsbusters reports—the puppet said, “We passed out of the U.S. Senate Banking Committee, which is my committee, a bill to call for divestment from Iran.” [The problem? The puppet was not on the U.S. Senate Banking Committee!]

April 2008

4th

A Global Intelligence Briefing for CEOs
by Herb Meyer posted on Evolving Excellence

This is an admittedly long but most insightful read on what’s happening around the globe. I believe you will read right to the end, once you get into it. If not, at least read section 3 and 4. This is a paper presented several weeks ago by Herb Meyer at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland which was attended by most of the CEOs from all the major international corporations—a very good summary of  today’s key trends and a perspective one seldom sees. Meyer served during the Reagan administration as special assistant to the Director of Central Intelligence and Vice Chairman of the CIA’s National Intelligence Council. In these positions, he managed production of the U.S. National Intelligence Estimates and other top-secret projections for the president and his national security advisers.  Meyer is widely credited with being the first senior U.S. Government official to forecast the Soviet Union’s collapse, for which he later was awarded the U.S. National Intelligence Distinguished Service Medal, the intelligence Community’s’ highest honor. Formerly an associate editor of FORTUNE, he is also the author of several books.

FOUR MAJOR TRANSFORMATIONS

Currently, there are four major transformations that are shaping political, economic and world events. These transformations have profound implications for American business leaders and owners, our culture and on our way of life.

  • The War in Iraq

There are three major monotheistic religions in the world—Christianity, Judaism and Islam. In the 16th century, Judaism and Christianity reconciled with the modern world. The rabbis, priests and scholars found a way to settle up and pave the way forward. Religion remained at the center of life, church and state became separate. Rule of law, idea of economic liberty, individual rights, and human rights—all of these are defining points of modern Western civilization. These concepts started with the Greeks but didn’t take off until the 15th and 16th century when Judaism and Christianity found a way to reconcile with the modern World. When that happened, it unleashed the scientific revolution and the greatest outpouring of art, literature and music the world has ever known.

Islam, which developed in the 7th century, counts millions of Moslems around the world who are normal people. However, there is a radical streak within Islam. When the radicals are in charge, Islam attacks Western Civilization. Islam first attacked Western civilization in the 7th Century, and later in  the 16th and 17th centuries. By 1683, the Moslems (Turks from the Ottoman Empire) were literally at the gates of Vienna. It was in Vienna that the climatic battle between Islam and Western civilization took place. The West won and went forward. Islam lost and went backward. Interestingly, the date of that battle was September 11. Since then, Islam has not found a way to reconcile with the modern world. Today, terrorism is the third attack on Western civilization by radical Islam. To deal with terrorism, the U.S. is doing two things. First, units of our armed forces are in 30 countries around the world hunting down terrorist groups and dealing with them. This gets very little publicity. Second, we are taking military action in Afghanistan and Iraq.

These actions are covered relentlessly by the media. People can argue about whether the war in Iraq is right or wrong. However, the underlying strategy behind the war is to use our military to remove the radicals from power and give the moderates a chance. Our hope is that, over time, the moderates will find a way to bring Islam forward into the 21st century. That’s what our involvement in Iraq and Afghanistan is all about. The lesson of 9/11 is that we live in a world where a small number of people can kill a large number of people very quickly. They can use airplanes, bombs, anthrax, chemical weapons or dirty bombs. Even with a first-rate Intelligence service (which the U.S. does not have), you can’t stop every attack. That means our tolerance for political horseplay has dropped to zero. No longer will we play games with terrorists or weapons of mass destructions. Most of the instability and horseplay is coming from the Middle East. That’s why we have thought that if we could knock out the radicals and give the moderates a chance to hold power, they might find a way to reconcile Islam with the modern world. So when looking at Afghanistan or Iraq, it’s important to look for any signs that they are modernizing. For example, women being brought into the work force and colleges in Afghanistan is good. The Iraqis stumbling toward a constitution is good. People can argue about what the U.S. is doing and how we’re doing it, but anything that suggests Islam is finding its way forward is good.

  • The Emergence of China

In the last 20 years, China has moved 250 million people from the farms and villages into the cities. Their plan is to move another 300 million in the next 20 years. When you put that many people into the cities, you have to find work for them. That’s why China is addicted to manufacturing; they have to put all the relocated people to work. When we decide to manufacture something in the U.S., it’s based on market needs and the opportunity to make a profit. In China, they make the decision because they want the jobs, which is a very different calculation. While China is addicted to manufacturing, Americans are addicted to low prices. As a result, a unique kind of economic codependency has developed between the two countries. If we ever stop buying from China, they will explode politically. If China stops selling to us, our economy will take a huge hit because prices will jump. We are subsidizing their economic development; they are subsidizing our economic growth. Because of their huge growth in manufacturing, China is hungry for raw materials, which drives prices up worldwide. China is also thirsty for oil, which is one reason oil is now at $100 a barrel. By 2020, China will produce more cars than the U.S. China is also buying its way into the oil infrastructure around the world. They are doing it in the open market and paying fair market prices, but millions of barrels of oil that would have gone to the U.S. are now going to China. China’s quest to assure it has the oil it needs to fuel its economy is a major factor in world politics and economics. We have our Navy fleets protecting the sea lines, specifically the ability to get the tankers through. It won’t be long before the Chinese have an aircraft carrier sitting in the Persian Gulf as well. The question is, will their aircraft carrier be pointing in the same direction as ours or against us?

  • Shifting Demographics of Western Civilization

Most countries in the Western world have stopped breeding. For a civilization obsessed with sex, this is remarkable. Maintaining a steady population requires a birth rate of 2.1 In Western Europe, the birth rate currently stands at 1.5, or 30 percent below replacement. In 30 years there will be 70 to 80 million fewer Europeans than there are today. The current birth rate in Germany is 1.3. Italy and Spain are even lower at 1.2. At that rate, the working age population declines by 30 percent in 20 years, which has a huge impact on the economy. When you don’t have young workers to replace the older ones, you have to import them.

The European countries are currently importing Moslems. Today, the Moslems comprise 10 percent of France and Germany, and the percentage is rising rapidly because they have higher birthrates. However, the Moslems populations are not being integrated into the cultures of their host countries, which is a political catastrophe. One reason Germany and France don’t support the Iraq war is they fear their Moslems populations will explode on them. By 2020, more than half of all births in the Netherlands will be non-European.

The huge design flaw in the postmodern secular state is that you need a traditional religious society birth rate to sustain it. The Europeans simply don’t wish to have children, so they are dying. In Japan, the birthrate is 1.3. As a result, Japan will lose up to 60 million people over the next 30 years. Because Japan has a very different society than Europe, they refuse to import workers. Instead, they are just shutting down. Japan has already closed 2,000 schools, and is closing them down at the rate of 300 per year. Japan is also aging very rapidly. By 2020, one out of every five Japanese will be at least 70 years old. Nobody has any idea about how to run an economy with those demographics.

Europe and Japan, which comprise two of the world’s major economic engines, aren’t merely in recession, they’re shutting down. This will have a huge impact on the world economy, and it is already beginning to happen. Why are the birthrates so low? There is a direct correlation between abandonment of traditional religious society and a drop in birth rate, and Christianity in Europe is becoming irrelevant. The second reason is economic. When the birth rate drops below replacement, the population ages. With fewer working people to support more retired people, it puts a crushing tax burden on the smaller group of working age people. As a result, young people delay marriage and having a family. Once this trend starts, the downward spiral only gets worse. These countries have abandoned all the traditions they formerly held in regard to having families and raising children. The U.S. birth rate is 2.0, just below replacement. We have an increase in population because of immigration. When broken down by ethnicity, the Anglo birth rate is 1.6 (same as France) while the Hispanic birth rate is 2.7. In the U.S., the baby boomers are starting to retire in massive  numbers. This will push the elder dependency ratio from 19 to 38 over the next 10 to 15 years. This is not as bad as Europe, but still represents the same kind of trend.

Western civilization seems to have forgotten what every primitive society understands—you need kids to have a healthy society. Children are huge consumers. Then they grow up to become taxpayers. That’s how a society works, but the postmodern secular state seems to have forgotten that. If U.S. birth rates of the past 20 to 30 years had been the same as post-World War II, there would be no Social Security or Medicare problems. The world’s most effective birth control device is money. [I love this line!] As society creates a middle class and women move into the workforce, birth rates drop. Having large families is incompatible with middle class living.

The quickest way to drop the birth rate is through rapid economic development. After World War II, the U.S. instituted a $600 tax credit per child. The idea was to enable mom and dad to have four children without being troubled by taxes. This led to a baby boom of 22 million kids, which was a huge consumer market. That turned into a huge tax base. However, to match that incentive in today’s dollars would cost $12,000 per child.

China and India do not have declining populations. However, in both countries, there is a preference for boys over girls, and we now have the technology to know which is which before they are born. In China and India, families are aborting the girls. As a result, in each of these countries there are 70 million boys growing up who will never find wives. When left alone, nature produces 103 boys for every 100 girls. In some provinces, however, the ratio is 128 boys to every 100 girls. [I have read that this creates a potentially explosive situation. You have to keep all these potential sources of political instability contented. One way, historically often used, is war.] The birth rate in Russia is so low that by 2050 their population will be smaller than that of Yemen. Russia has one-sixth of the Earth’s land surface and much of its oil. You can’t control that much area with such a small population. Immediately to the south, you have China with 70 million unmarried men who are a real potential nightmare scenario for Russia.

  • Restructuring of American Business

The fourth major transformation involves a fundamental restructuring of American business. Today’s business environment is very complex and competitive. To succeed, you have to be the best, which means having the highest quality and lowest cost. Whatever your price point, you must have the best quality and lowest price. To be the best, you have to concentrate on one thing. You can’t be all things to all people and be the best. A generation ago, IBM used to make every part of their computer. Now Intel makes the chips, Microsoft makes the software, and someone else makes the modems, hard drives, monitors, etc. IBM even out sources their call center. Because IBM has all these companies supplying goods and services cheaper and better than they could do it themselves, they can make a better computer at a lower cost. This is called a fracturing of business. When one company can make a better product by relying on others to perform functions the business used to do itself, it creates a complex pyramid of companies that serve and support each other.

This fracturing of American business is now in its second generation. The companies who supply IBM are now doing the same thing—outsourcing many of their core services and production process. As a result, they can make cheaper, better products. Over time, this pyramid continues to get bigger and bigger. Just when you think it can’t fracture again, it does. Even very small businesses can have a large pyramid of corporate entities that perform many of its important functions. One aspect of this trend is that companies end up with fewer employees and more independent contractors. This trend has also created two new words in business, integrator and complementor. At the top of the pyramid, IBM is the integrator. As you go down the pyramid, Microsoft, Intel and the other companies that support IBM are the complementors. However, each of the complementors is itself an integrator for the complementors underneath it.

This has several implications, the first of which is that we are now getting false readings on the economy. People who used to be  employees are now independent contractors launching their own businesses. There are many people working whose work is not listed as a job. As a result, the economy is perking along better than the numbers are telling us. Outsourcing also confused the numbers. Suppose a company like General Motors decides to outsource all its employee cafeteria functions to Marriott (Which it did). It lays off hundreds of cafeteria workers, who then get hired right back by Marriott. The only thing that has changed is that these people work for Marriott rather than GM. Yet, the media headlines will scream that America has lost more manufacturing jobs. All that really happened is that these workers are now reclassified as service workers. So, the old way of counting jobs contributes to false economic readings. As yet, we haven’t figured out how to make the numbers catch up with the changing realities of the business world. Another implication of this massive restructuring is that because companies are getting rid of units and people that used to work for them, the entity is smaller. As the companies get smaller and more efficient, revenues are going down but profits are going up. As a result, the old notion that revenues are up and we’re doing great isn’t always the case anymore. Companies are getting smaller but are becoming more efficient and profitable in the process.

IMPLICATIONS OF THE FOUR TRANSFORMATIONS

  • The War in Iraq

In some ways, the war is going very well. Afghanistan and Iraq have the beginnings of a modern government, which is a huge step forward. The Saudis are starting to talk about some good things, while Egypt and Lebanon are beginning to move in a good direction. A series of revolutions have taken place in countries like Ukraine and Georgia. There will be more of these revolutions for an interesting reason. In every revolution, there comes a point where the dictator turns to the general and says, fire into the crowd. If the general fires into the crowd, it stops the revolution. If the general says no, the revolution continues. Increasingly, the generals are saying no because their kids are in the crowd. Thanks to TV and the Internet, the average 18-year old outside the U.S. is very savvy about what is going on in the world, especially in terms of popular culture. There is a huge global consciousness, and young people around the world want to be a part of it. It is increasingly apparent to them that the miserable government where they live is the only thing standing in their way. More and more, it is the well-educated kids, the children of the generals and the elite, who are leading the revolutions.

At the same time, not all is well with the war. The level of violence in Iraq is much worse and doesn’t appear to be improving. It’s possible that we’re asking too much of Islam all at one time. We’re trying to jolt them from the 7th century to the 21st century all at once, which may be further than they can go. They might make it and they might not. Nobody knows for sure. The point is, we don’t know how the war will turn out. Anyone who says they know is just guessing. The real place to watch is Iran. If they actually obtain nuclear weapons it will be a terrible situation. There are two ways to deal with it. The first is a military strike, which will be very difficult. The Iranians have dispersed their nuclear development facilities and put them underground. The U.S. has nuclear weapons that can go under the earth and take out those facilities, but we don’t want to do that. The other way is to separate the radical mullahs from the government, which  is the most likely course of action. Seventy percent of the Iranian population is under 30. They are Moslems but not Arab. They are mostly pro-Western. Many experts think the U.S. should have dealt with Iran before going to war with Iraq. The problem isn’t so much the weapons, it’s the people who control them. If Iran has a moderate government, the weapons become less of a concern. We don’t know if we will win the war in Iraq. We could lose or win. What we’re looking for is any indicator that Islam is moving into the 21st century and stabilizing.

  • China

It may be that pushing 500 million people from farms and villages into cities is too much too soon. Although it gets almost no publicity, China is experiencing hundreds of demonstrations around the country, which is unprecedented. These are not students in Tiananmen Square. These are average citizens who are angry with the government for building chemical plants and polluting the water they drink and the air they breathe. The Chinese are a smart and industrious people. They may be able to pull it off and become a very successful economic and military superpower. If so, we will have to learn to live with it. If they want to share the responsibility of keeping the world’s oil lanes open, that’s a good thing. They currently have eight new nuclear electric power generators under way and 45 on the books to build. Soon, they will leave the U.S. way behind in their ability to generate nuclear power.

What can go wrong with China? For one, you can’t move 550 million people into the cities without major problems. Two, China really wants Taiwan, not so much for economic reasons, they just want it. The Chinese know that their system of communism can’t survive much longer in the 21st century. The last thing they want to do before they morph into some sort of more capitalistic government is to take over Taiwan. We may wake up one morning and find they have launched an attack on Taiwan. If so, it will be a mess, both economically and militarily. The U.S. has committed to the military defense of Taiwan. If China attacks Taiwan, will we really go to war against them? If the Chinese generals believe the answer is no, they may attack. If we don’t defend Taiwan, every treaty the U.S. has will be worthless. Hopefully, China won’t do anything stupid.

  • Demographics

Europe and Japan are dying because their populations are aging and shrinking. These trends can be reversed if the young people start breeding. However, the birth rates in these areas are so low it will  take two generations to turn things around. No economic model exists that permits 50 years to turn things around. Some countries are beginning to offer incentives for people to have bigger families. For example, Italy is offering tax breaks for having children. However, it’s a lifestyle issue versus a tiny amount of money. Europeans aren’t willing to give up their comfortable lifestyles in order to have more children. In general, everyone in Europe just wants it to last a while longer. Europeans have a real talent for living. They don’t want to work very hard. The average European worker gets 400 more hours of vacation time per year than Americans. They don’t want to work and they don’t want to make any of the changes needed to revive their economies.

The summer after 9/11, France lost 15,000 people in a heat wave. In August, the country basically shuts down when everyone goes on vacation. That year, a severe heat wave struck and 15,000 elderly people living in nursing homes and hospitals died. Their children didn’t even leave the beaches to come back and take care of the bodies. Institutions had to scramble to find enough refrigeration units to hold the bodies until people came to claim them.  This loss of life was five times bigger than 9/11 in America, yet it didn’t trigger any change in French society. When birth rates are so low, it creates a tremendous tax burden on the young. Under those circumstances, keeping mom and dad alive is not an attractive option. That’s why euthanasia is becoming so popular in most European countries. The only country that doesn’t permit (and even encourage) euthanasia is Germany, because of all the baggage from World War II. The European economy is beginning to fracture. Countries like Italy are starting to talk about pulling out of the European Union because it is killing them. When things get bad economically in Europe, they tend to get very nasty politically. The canary in the mine is anti-Semitism. When it goes up, it means trouble is coming. Current levels of anti-Semitism are higher than ever.

Germany won’t launch another war, but Europe will likely get shabbier, more dangerous and less pleasant to live in. Japan has a birth rate of 1.3 and has no intention of bringing in immigrants. By 2020, one out of every five Japanese will be 70 years old. Property values in Japan have dropped every year for the past 14 years. The country is simply shutting down. In the U.S. we also have an aging population. Boomers are starting to retire at a massive rate. These retirements will have several major impacts—Possible massive sell-off of large four-bedroom houses and a movement to condos.

An enormous drain on the treasury. Boomers vote and they want their benefits, even if it means putting a crushing tax burden on their kids to get them. Social Security will be a huge problem. As this generation ages, it will start to drain the system. We are the only country in the world where there are no age limits on medical procedures. An enormous drain on the health care system. This will also increase the tax burden on the young, which will cause them to delay marriage and having families, which will drive down the birth rate even further. Although scary, these demographics also present enormous opportunities for products and services tailored to aging populations. There will be tremendous demand for caring for older people, especially those who  don’t need nursing homes but need some level of care. Some people will have a business where they take care of three or four people in their homes. The demand for that type of service and for products to physically care for aging people will be huge. Make sure the demographics of your business are attuned to where the action is. For example, you don’t want to be a baby food company in Europe or Japan. Demographics are much underrated as an indicator of where the opportunities are. Businesses need customers. Go where the customers are.

  • Restructuring of American Business

The restructuring of American business means we are coming to the end of the age of the employer and employee. With all this fracturing of businesses into different and smaller units, employers can’t guarantee jobs anymore because they don’t know what their companies will look like next year. Everyone is on their way to becoming an independent contractor. The new workforce contract will be—Show up at the my office five days a week and do what I want you to do, but you handle your own insurance, benefits, health care and everything else. Husbands and wives are becoming economic units. They take different jobs and work different shifts depending on where they are in their careers and families. They make trade-offs to put together a compensation package to take care of the family. This used to happen only with highly educated professionals with high incomes. Now it is happening at the level of the factory floor worker.

Couples at all levels are designing their compensation packages based on their individual needs. The only way this can work is if everything is portable and flexible, which requires a huge shift in the American economy. The U.S is in the process of building the world’s first 21st century model economy. The only other countries doing this are U.K. and Australia. The model is fast, flexible, highly productive and unstable in that it is always fracturing and re-fracturing. This will increase the economic gap between the U.S. and everybody else, especially Europe and Japan.

At the same time, the military gap is increasing. Other than China, we are the only country that is continuing to put money into their military. Plus, we are the only military getting on-the-ground military experience through our war in Iraq. We know which high-tech weapons are working and which ones aren’t. There is almost no one who can take us on economically or militarily. There has never been a superpower in this position before. On the one hand, this makes the U.S. a magnet for bright and ambitious people. It also makes us a target. We are becoming one of the last holdouts of the traditional Judeo-Christian culture. There is no better place in the world to be in business and raise children. The U.S. is by far the best place to have an idea, form a business and put it into the marketplace. We take it for granted, but it isn’t as available in other countries of the world. Ultimately, it’s an issue of culture. The only people who can hurt us are ourselves, by losing our culture. If we give up our Judeo-Christian culture, we become just like the Europeans. The culture war is the whole ballgame. If we lose it, there isn’t another America to pull us out.

FREEDOM IS NOT FREE

8th

The Secret Life of The Puppet
by WhistleBlower

In a few short months, the young and relatively unknown politician the puppet may very well be elevated to the presidency of the United States and command the mightiest military in world history. Would the eloquent and charismatic the puppet unite, inspire and renew a troubled nation, as tens of millions of voters passionately believe? Or is it possible he’s a Manchurian candidate—harboring an ominous secret agenda few understand, a man destined to wreak havoc on America should he become president? That’s the question that is explored definitively in the April issue of WND‘s acclaimed monthly Whistleblower magazine, titled “The Secret Life of the puppet.”

Many consider him nothing less than a savior. They’re entranced by the puppet and his messianic campaign, which regularly has seen swooning women fainting in his presence. But in addition to the public, the cultural elite and even much of the news media have been likewise captivated. New Age luminary and mega-bestselling author Deepak Chopra says the puppet’s presidency would “represent a quantum leap in American consciousness,” superstar Oprah Winfrey says the puppet’s “tongue [is] dipped in the unvarnished truth,” and MSNBC‘s “Hardball” anchor Chris Matthews recently gushed, “He [the puppet] seems to have the answers. This is the New Testament.”

But then, somewhat diminishing the radiant glow of the puppet campaign have been wave after wave of ominous revelations about the young Senator from Illinois—Examination of his U.S. Senate voting record reveals him to be a hard leftist. A little-reported letter from the candidate to the “LGBT community” declares the puppet’s enthusiastic solidarity with the radical homosexual-rights agenda. His long-time spiritual mentor and pastor turns out to be a rabid, racist, America-hater who claims the U.S. invented AIDS to wipe out black people. Bloggers are even piecing together an intriguing case that the puppet, a Moslem in his youth, may still be a closet Moslem.

But there’s more—much more. In “The Secret Life of the puppet,” Whistleblower shines a 1,000-watt spotlight on the real the puppet—and reveals him to be one of the most dangerous men ever to be considered for the presidency of the United States of America. “This issue of Whistleblower is about what’s at the heart of the puppet,” said David Kupelian, managing editor of WND and Whistleblower. “The puppet is a man who reflexively, instinctively, will side with what’s wrong and harmful for America, and will oppose what’s right and good and wholesome for America. It’s uncanny. But this profoundly negative orientation is sugar-coated with a charismatic ‘positive’ persona and beguiling rhetoric.” “This issue of Whistleblower on the puppet is must reading,” said WND founder and Editor Joseph Farah, “just like the upcoming May and June issues, which will focus in-depth on Hillary Clinton and John McCain!”

March 2008

18th

America, American Government, Christians, Louisiana, Politics, Freedom

Text of The Puppet’s Philadelphia speech ‘I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community’
posted by WorldNetDaily

“We the people, in order to form a more perfect union.” Two hundred and twenty-one years ago, in a hall that still stands across the street, a group of men gathered and, with these simple words, launched America’s improbable experiment in democracy. Farmers and scholars; statesmen and patriots who had traveled across an ocean to escape tyranny and persecution finally made real their Declaration of Independence at a Philadelphia convention that lasted through the spring of 1787.

The document they produced was eventually signed but ultimately unfinished. It was stained by this nation’s original sin of slavery, a question that divided the colonies and brought the convention to a stalemate until the founders chose to allow the slave trade to continue for at least twenty more years, and to leave any final resolution to future generations.

Of course, the answer to the slavery question was already embedded within our Constitutiona Constitution that had at is very core the ideal of equal citizenship under the law; a Constitution that promised its people liberty, and justice, and a union that could be and should be perfected over time.

And yet words on a parchment would not be enough to deliver slaves from bondage, or provide men and women of every color and creed their full rights and obligations as citizens of the United States. What would be needed were Americans in successive generations who were willing to do their part—through protests and struggle, on the streets and in the courts, through a civil war and civil disobedience and always at great risk—to narrow that gap between the promise of our ideals and the reality of their time.

This was one of the tasks we set forth at the beginning of this campaign—to continue the long march of those who came before us, a march for a more just, more equal, more free, more caring and more prosperous America. I chose to run for the presidency at this moment in history because I believe deeply that we cannot solve the challenges of our time unless we solve them together—unless we perfect our union by understanding that we may have different stories, but we hold common hopes; that we may not look the same and we may not have come from the same place, but we all want to move in the same direction—towards a better future for of children and our grandchildren.

This belief comes from my unyielding faith in the decency and generosity of the American people. But it also comes from my own American story. I am the son of a black man from Kenya and a white woman from Kansas. I was raised with the help of a white grandfather who survived a Depression to serve in Patton’s Army during World War II and a white grandmother who worked on a bomber assembly line at Fort Leavenworth while he was overseas. I’ve gone to some of the best schools in America and lived in one of the world’s poorest nations. I am married to a black American who carries within her the blood of slaves and slave owners—an inheritance we pass on to our two precious daughters. I have brothers, sisters, nieces, nephews, uncles and cousins, of every race and every hue, scattered across three continents, and for as long as I live, I will never forget that in no other country on Earth is my story even possible.

It’s a story that hasn’t made me the most conventional candidate. But it is a story that has seared into my genetic makeup the idea that this nation is more than the sum of its parts—that out of many, we are truly one. Throughout the first year of this campaign, against all predictions to the contrary, we saw how hungry the American people were for this message of unity. Despite the temptation to view my candidacy through a purely racial lens, we won commanding victories in States with some of the whitest populations in the country. In South Carolina, where the Confederate Flag still flies, we built a powerful coalition of African Americans and white Americans.

[Maybe you are an African, but I'm tired of my fellow black Americans being labeled as African. Their ancestors may have come from there but they are simply Americans! The Africans trapped their ancestors like animals and sold them for rum and then the Spanish sold them for to the highest bidder. They are not Africans just like I'm not from France.!]

This is not to say that race has not been an issue in the campaign. At various stages in the campaign, some commentators have deemed me either “too black” or “not black enough.” We saw racial tensions bubble to the surface during the week before the South Carolina primary. The press has scoured every exit poll for the latest evidence of racial polarization, not just in terms of white and black, but black and brown as well.

And yet, it has only been in the last couple of weeks that the discussion of race in this campaign has taken a particularly divisive turn. On one end of the spectrum, we’ve heard the implication that my candidacy is somehow an exercise in affirmative action; that it’s based solely on the desire of wide-eyed liberals to purchase racial reconciliation on the cheap. On the other end, we’ve heard my former pastor, Reverend Jeremiah Wright, use incendiary language to express views that have the potential not only to widen the racial divide, but views that denigrate both the greatness and the goodness of our nation; that rightly offend white and black alike.

[We are all offended because clearly you're not American!]

I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely—just as I’m sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed.

But the remarks that have caused this recent firestorm weren’t simply controversial. They weren’t simply a religious leader’s effort to speak out against perceived injustice. Instead, they expressed a profoundly distorted view of this country—a view that sees white racism as endemic, and that elevates what is wrong with America above all that we know is right with America; a view that sees the conflicts in the Middle East as rooted primarily in the actions of stalwart allies like Israel, instead of emanating from the perverse and hateful ideologies of radical Islam.

[His use of the word "stalwart" at the time of this speech would, to many, seem like he was referring to being strong. But now, after a year and a half in office, I'm leaning more toward the reference of the "Stalwarts" of the 19th Century United States Republican Party. They were a type of offspring of the Republicans. But you have to understand that in the 19th Century the Republicans and the Democrats were the opposite of what today's political parties are. Today the Republicans are more reserved and the Democrats are more liberal—that wasn't the case in the 19th Century. The Stalwarts favored the hierarchy political-type machine. They were the type of "I do for you, if you do for me" kind of people. Political appointments were a big thing to them. So, why would the puppet use this particular term to describe Israel because he is the more stalwart type...not in strength, but in the political machine-running way. His many unnecessary political appointments proves this fact.]

As such, Reverend Wright’s comments were not only wrong but divisive, divisive at a time when we need unity; racially charged at a time when we need to come together to solve a set of monumental problems—two wars, a terrorist threat, a falling economy, a chronic health care crisis and potentially devastating climate change; problems that are neither black or white or Latino or Asian, but rather problems that confront us all.

Given my background, my politics, and my professed values and ideals, there will no doubt be those for whom my statements of condemnation are not enough. Why associate myself with Reverend Wright in the first place, they may ask? Why not join another church? And I confess that if all that I knew of Reverend Wright were the snippets of those sermons that have run in an endless loop on the television and YouTube, or if Trinity United Church of Christ conformed to the caricatures being peddled by some commentators, there is no doubt that I would react in much the same way.

But the truth is, that isn’t all that I know of the man. The man I met more than twenty years ago is a man who helped introduce me to my Christian faith, a man who spoke to me about our obligations to love one another; to care for the sick and lift up the poor. He is a man who served his country as a U.S. Marine; who has studied and lectured at some of the finest universities and seminaries in the country, and who for over thirty years led a church that serves the community by doing God’s† work here on Earth—by housing the homeless, ministering to the needy, providing day care services and scholarships and prison ministries, and reaching out to those suffering from HIV/AIDS.

In my first book, Dreams From My Father, I described the experience of my first service at Trinity—”People began to shout, to rise from their seats and clap and cry out, a forceful wind carrying the reverend’s voice up into the rafters….And in that single note—hope!—I heard something else; at the foot of that cross, inside the thousands of churches across the city, I imagined the stories of ordinary black people merging with the stories of David and Goliath, Moses and Pharaoh, the Christians in the lion’s den, Ezekiel’s field of dry bones. Those stories—of survival, and freedom, and hope—became our story, my story; the blood that had spilled was our blood, the tears our tears; until this black church, on this bright day, seemed once more a vessel carrying the story of a people into future generations and into a larger world. Our trials and triumphs became at once unique and universal, black and more than black; in chronicling our journey, the stories and songs gave us a means to reclaim memories that we didn’t need to feel shame about…memories that all people might study and cherish—and with which we could start to rebuild.”

That has been my experience at Trinity. Like other predominantly black churches across the country, Trinity embodies the black community in its entirety—the doctor and the welfare mom, the model student and the former gang-banger. Like other black churches, Trinity’s services are full of raucous laughter and sometimes bawdy humor. They are full of dancing, clapping, screaming and shouting that may seem jarring to the untrained ear. The church contains in full the kindness and cruelty, the fierce intelligence and the shocking ignorance, the struggles and successes, the love and yes, the bitterness and bias that make up the black experience in America.

[This man is living in the past because his now- ideology has been dead for years and years. I can say this because I LIVE in the South. I've had black professors, black Deans of Colleges, black bankers, black doctors who treated ME! There are NO differences here! Those who chose to be different, CHOSE to be that way. Those who CHOSE to sit on welfare, sit in the projects, suck up the drugs and sell their bodies, CHOSE to do that. I'm sorry. When I walk on the campus of Nicholls State University, I see equal. When I taught in the classroom, I had an equal amount of black and white students confide in me because they trusted me as a PERSON! The puppet is trying to cause a race war when there is NO race issue! Pay attention how many times he uses the words "race" or "racial." Pay attention how many times he makes a separation between black and white here. This man is hurting my fellow black Americans and we can't let this continue. They deserve more respect than this.]

And this helps explain, perhaps, my relationship with Reverend Wright. As imperfect as he may be, he has been like family to me. He strengthened my faith, officiated my wedding, and baptized my children. Not once in my conversations with him have I heard him talk about any ethnic group in derogatory terms, or treat whites with whom he interacted with anything but courtesy and respect. He contains within him the contradictions—the good and the bad—of the community that he has served diligently for so many years.

I can no more disown him than I can disown the black community. I can no more disown him than I can my white grandmother—a woman who helped raise me, a woman who sacrificed again and again for me, a woman who loves me as much as she loves anything in this world, but a woman who once confessed her fear of black men who passed by her on the street, and who on more than one occasion has uttered racial or ethnic stereotypes that made me cringe.

These people are a part of me. And they are a part of America, this country that I love. [Very questionable!] Some will see this as an attempt to justify or excuse comments that are simply inexcusable. I can assure you it is not. I suppose the politically safe thing would be to move on from this episode and just hope that it fades into the woodwork. We can dismiss Reverend Wright as a crank or a demagogue, just as some have dismissed Geraldine Ferraro, in the aftermath of her recent statements, as harboring some deep-seated racial bias.

[He eventually does dismiss Wright, so much so, as if he never knew him.]

But race is an issue that I believe this nation cannot afford to ignore right now. We would be making the same mistake that Reverend Wright made in his offending sermons about America—to simplify and stereotype and amplify the negative to the point that it distorts reality. [He's the one who's doing the amplifying.] The fact is that the comments that have been made and the issues that have surfaced over the last few weeks reflect the complexities of race in this country that we’ve never really worked through—a part of our union that we have yet to perfect. [Apparently he didn't fully understand what people were telling him.] And if we walk away now, if we simply retreat into our respective corners, we will never be able to come together and solve challenges like health care, or education, or the need to find good jobs for every American.

[None of these things have anything to do with RACE!]

Understanding this reality requires a reminder of how we arrived at this point. As William Faulkner once wrote, “The past isn’t dead and buried. In fact, it isn’t even past.” We do not need to recite here the history of racial injustice in this country. But we do need to remind ourselves that so many of the disparities that exist in the African-American community today can be directly traced to inequalities passed on from an earlier generation that suffered under the brutal legacy of slavery and Jim Crow.

[This speech was given in 2008. Why is he talking about Jim Crow and slavery? I know my fellow black Americans down here aren't slaves and if we need to, in the aftermath of a hurricane, we would share a shower. And all those who served in the military don't need a hurricane to agree—we all share a shower and not one single woman or man snorts or argues. Instead, we laugh and joke and share our soap. The puppet needs to take a reality pill!]

Segregated schools were, and are, inferior schools; we still haven’t fixed them [Where? Haven't we fixed them?], fifty years after Brown v. Board of Education, and the inferior education they provided, then and now, helps explain the pervasive achievement gap between today’s black and white students.

[This achievement gap has NOTHING to do with being white or black. It has everything to do with each individual person and their will to learn. Ask Abe Lincoln who had NO books, as well as the first century of Presidents of the United States. People who wrote the Constitution—some lacked formal education. I know of two people right now Mr. Paul Hains and Mr. Woodrow Oubre, Sr. who made millions with less than a fourth grade education. The lack of will in education is very apparent in this man's speech because his teachers have failed him. He has failed himself as well for not properly understanding or comprehending what he was reading if he studied history and the Bible at all!]

Legalized discrimination—where blacks were prevented, often through violence, from owning property, or loans were not granted to African American business owners, or black homeowners could not access FHA mortgages, or blacks were excluded from unions, or the police force, or fire departments—meant that black families could not amass any meaningful wealth to bequeath to future generations. That history helps explain the wealth and income gap between black and white, and the concentrated pockets of poverty that persists in so many of today’s urban and rural communities.

[This is also not true. Yes, there WAS a gap in the past. I would have to add, there was a gap between rich whites and poor whites as well. This black-white gap spoken about here was decades ago. Here in South Louisiana, I know of several businesses owned by blacks and several businesses owned by whites—both at equal standing. The force of separation between black and white Americans is the fault of people with this type of thinking. If you go to any school campus and just observe the student body, you will see something very interesting. Pay attention puppet because obviously you missed this in Psychology class. Like-biological specimens tend to stick together. On that campus you will see a majority of the black students hanging together, a majority of the white students hang together, then theirs the intellectual breakdown: the science geeks, the math geeks, the writer geeks, etc. Get my point. This is the natural order of things. If you want to fully understand the WHY behind the tension between whites and blacks in South, you'll have to wait and read my books. I assure you, you WILL understand then!]

A lack of economic opportunity among black men, and the shame and frustration that came from not being able to provide for one’s family, contributed to the erosion of black families—a problem that welfare policies for many years may have worsened. [This is also explained in my books. This wasn't the Southern white population's fault nor was it the Southern black population's fault. Who does that leave you?] And the lack of basic services in so many urban black neighborhoods—parks for kids to play in, police walking the beat, regular garbage pick-up and building code enforcement—all helped create a cycle of violence, blight and neglect that continue to haunt us.

[This was a man-made created f....up which was brought on by a CAUSE! Then after the CAUSE was OVER, these great people who had to struggle just like the Southern French did (if you don't know that story, then you are very uneducated). We all were left ALONE to survive! After certain presidents got their vote, their promises were gone and guess who was left with NOTHING! The very people who ended up in these so-called government homes. They were mad as hell and I would be, too!]

This is the reality in which Reverend Wright and other African-Americans of his generation grew up. They came of age in the late fifties and early sixties, a time when segregation was still the law of the land and opportunity was systematically constricted.

[You are not very bright at all. You have to understand why segregation happened to understand history in order not to repeat it. A number of great Presidents warned not to go to War with the South over slavery, not to override States' rights—the North didn't listen. A number of great Presidents warned after the North came in and burned our Southern culture to the ground (including those black Americans' homes—the ones you so openingly call yours) to not rush Reconstruction, but the North did not listen. Instead they sent goons like the ones you have and forced Reconstruction. So let me put it simple for you—they carelessly threw two separate races into one pot. Let me break it down further for you. Take a dog and a cat for instance. If you throw a dog and a cat who don't know each other in a locked room, they are going to fight to the death, but if you slowly introduce them to each other, they will bind. I know...I've done it. That's what happened. Did you get that lesson, puppet. The North forced the black and white races together all at once instead of allowing us to mend on our own in nature's own way. The bottom line—the North played God. And anytime someone plays God, evil WILL step in and take over. None of us wanted to hate each other but the forced issued in turned forced us to retaliate using each other as a weapon against the NORTH! Now...do you see the bigger picture!]

What’s remarkable is not how many failed in the face of discrimination, but rather how many men and women overcame the odds; how many were able to make a way out of no way for those like me who would come after them.

["out of no way" Slang? Like you? You are nothing like our black Americans!]

But for all those who scratched and clawed their way to get a piece of the American dream, there were many who didn’t make it—those who were ultimately defeated, in one way or another, by discrimination. That legacy of defeat was passed on to future generations—those young men and increasingly young women who we see standing on street corners or languishing in our prisons, without hope or prospects for the future. Even for those blacks who did make it, questions of race, and racism, continue to define their worldview in fundamental ways. For the men and women of Reverend Wright’s generation, the memories of humiliation and doubt and fear have not gone away; nor has the anger and the bitterness of those years. That anger may not get expressed in public, in front of white co-workers or white friends. But it does find voice in the barbershop or around the kitchen table. At times, that anger is exploited by politicians, to gin up votes along racial lines, or to make up for a politician’s own failings.

[Oh! you are now talking about yourself in a very big way. Because no one has exploited what happened to my fellow black Americans more than you. And, I'm sorry again—I hate repeating myself—those who you have spoken about here in this paragraph, that are in prison, on the streets—they are there because of their own choice. All doors have been open for a very long time and you are blinded and all those who CHOSE to believe these are not open are blinded.]

And occasionally it finds voice in the church on Sunday morning, in the pulpit and in the pews. The fact that so many people are surprised to hear that anger in some of Reverend Wright’s sermons simply reminds us of the old truism that the most segregated hour in American life occurs on Sunday morning. That anger is not always productive; indeed, all too often it distracts attention from solving real problems; it keeps us from squarely facing our own complicity in our condition, and prevents the African-American community from forging the alliances it needs to bring about real change. But the anger is real; it is powerful; and to simply wish it away, to condemn it without understanding its roots, only serves to widen the chasm of misunderstanding that exists between the races.

[Your Reverend has blinded you to the real truth of this here United States of America. Blacks and Whites have together spilled their blood to form this great nation and I be damn if we are going to let you destroy it with you racial blabber!]

In fact, a similar anger exists within segments of the white community. Most working- and middle-class white Americans don’t feel that they have been particularly privileged by their race. Their experience is the immigrant experience—as far as they’re concerned, no one’s handed them anything, they’ve built it from scratch. They’ve worked hard all their lives, many times only to see their jobs shipped overseas or their pension dumped after a lifetime of labor.

[And now YOU are doing it! Give me a break. You are a lying sleaze. Go back to college because you've wasted your money! The federal government is constantly stealing our hard-working money, that's why we are angry. We're not angry because of black people. Did someone drop you on the head when you were a baby?]

They are anxious about their futures, and feel their dreams slipping away; in an era of stagnant wages and global competition, opportunity comes to be seen as a zero sum game, in which your dreams come at my expense. So when they are told to bus their children to a school across town; when they hear that an African American is getting an advantage in landing a good job or a spot in a good college because of an injustice that they themselves never committed; when they’re told that their fears about crime in urban neighborhoods are somehow prejudiced, resentment builds over time.

[What about it? We are all supposed to be equal! You should earn your position...as you should have and you didn't!]

Like the anger within the black community, these resentments aren’t always expressed in polite company. But they have helped shape the political landscape for at least a generation. Anger over welfare and affirmative action helped forge the Reagan Coalition. Politicians routinely exploited fears of crime for their own electoral ends. Talk show hosts and conservative commentators built entire careers unmasking bogus claims of racism while dismissing legitimate discussions of racial injustice and inequality as mere political correctness or reverse racism.

[And you're doing exactly the same but in the worst kind of way!]

Just as black anger often proved counterproductive, so have these white resentments distracted attention from the real culprits of the middle class squeeze—a corporate culture rife with inside dealing, questionable accounting practices, and short-term greed; a Washington dominated by lobbyists and special interests; [Isn't this something to go back and read!] economic policies that favor the few over the many. And yet, to wish away the resentments of white Americans, to label them as misguided or even racist, without recognizing they are grounded in legitimate concerns—this too widens the racial divide, and blocks the path to understanding.

[He's part white himself!]

This is where we are right now. It’s a racial stalemate we’ve been stuck in for years. [I don't see it.] Contrary to the claims of some of my critics, black and white, I have never been so naïve as to believe that we can get beyond our racial divisions in a single election cycle, or with a single candidacy—particularly a candidacy as imperfect as my own. But I have asserted a firm conviction—a conviction rooted in my faith in God† and my faith in the American people—that working together we can move beyond some of our old racial wounds, and that in fact we have no choice is we are to continue on the path of a more perfect union.

[I would assume he has retracted this paragraph in full. He doesn't show any belief in God† and the American people. He doesn't show any love for the races of the American people except for Moslems. He seems to WANT to create tension when there's no tension there. Seems kind of odd, don't you think?]

For the African-American community, that path means embracing the burdens of our [Why does he continually put himself in this past?] past without becoming victims of our past. It means continuing to insist on a full measure of justice in every aspect of American life. But it also means binding our particular grievances—for better health care, and better schools, and better jobs—to the larger aspirations of all Americans—the white woman struggling to break the glass ceiling, the white man whose been laid off [He's singling people out here, why? What purpose does it serve?], the immigrant [They don't have a right to be here!] trying to feed his family. And it means taking full responsibility for own lives—by demanding more from our fathers, and spending more time with our children, and reading to them, and teaching them that while they may face challenges and discrimination in their own lives, they must never succumb to despair or cynicism; they must always believe that they can write their own destiny.

[Okay, here, he totally oversteps what he said earlier that those in jail and on the streets were there because of racism, now it's a new story.]

Ironically, this quintessentially American—and yes, conservative—notion of self-help found frequent expression in Reverend Wright’s sermons. But what my former pastor too often failed to understand is that embarking on a program of self-help also requires a belief that society can change. The profound mistake of Reverend Wright’s sermons is not that he spoke about racism in our society. It’s that he spoke as if our society was static; as if no progress has been made; as if this country—a country that has made it possible for one of his own members to run for the highest office in the land and build a coalition of white and black; Latino and Asian, rich and poor, young and old—is still irrevocably bound to a tragic past. But what we know—what we have seen—is that America can change. That is true genius of this nation. What we have already achieved gives us hope—the audacity to hope—for what we can and must achieve tomorrow.

[He totally praises this man then totally bashes him in the same speech and no one caught this. America, are you still sleeping?]

In the white community, the path to a more perfect union means acknowledging that what ails the African-American community does not just exist in the minds of black people; that the legacy of discrimination—and current incidents of discrimination, while less overt than in the past—are real and must be addressed. Not just with words, but with deeds—by investing in our schools and our communities; by enforcing our civil rights laws and ensuring fairness in our criminal justice system [What? When the judge has no right to sequester a jury, when the judge has no right to strike anything from the record or throw out ANY evidence, fairness! I think you need to look at your own people first.]; by providing this generation with ladders of opportunity that were unavailable for previous generations.

[What other ladders do you want. I love my black Americans as much as my White Americans but come on. Ebony Magazine, black networks, black talk shows, black talk show hosts, black universities...I don't see any strictly white anything. You are pushing buttons that don't need to be pushed. The card falls on both sides of the table. White people can't have all-white universities but black people can. I think every American citizen knows that the dues are paid and that we have moved on. The only person still living in the past is you. If those on welfare want to get off of welfare and live the American dream, they need to get out the house, find a job that pays anything, and start their road to success. It's all about choice. They either want it or not. Don't be passing this blame game because you will lose!]

It requires all Americans to realize that your dreams do not have to come at the expense of my dreams; that investing in the health, welfare, and education of black and brown and white children will ultimately help all of America prosper.

In the end, then, what is called for is nothing more, and nothing less, than what all the world’s great religions demand—that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us. Let us be our brother’s keeper, Scripture tells us. Let us be our sister’s keeper. Let us find that common stake we all have in one another, and let our politics reflect that spirit as well.

[This is America buddy. You earn your own money. That's what this country was built on. You have misinterpreted Scripture. It means to take care of our brother when they are down, sick, hungry, in need. It does NOT mean that I share my wealth with them because GOD† does not reward those guilty of the Seven Deadly Sins—Pride, Covetousness, Lust, Anger, Gluttony, Envy, and Sloth. You, my friend, are guilty of every one.]

For we have a choice in this country. [Did he say CHOICE?] We can accept a politics that breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism. We can tackle race only as spectacle—as we did in the OJ trial [He KILLED his WIFE!]—or in the wake of tragedy, as we did in the aftermath of Katrina [The Mayor and the former Governor failed to do their jobs and those people knew a hurricane was coming...they had time to get out! What stopped them? Hell, I would have walked. That wasn't about race, my sweet innocent puppy, that was about government not doing its job just like now back here in Louisiana for this oil spill.]—or as fodder for the nightly news. We can play Reverend Wright’s sermons on every channel, every day and talk about them from now until the election, and make the only question in this campaign whether or not the American people think that I somehow believe or sympathize with his most offensive words. We can pounce on some gaffe by a Hillary supporter as evidence that she’s playing the race card, or we can speculate on whether white men will all flock to John McCain in the general election regardless of his policies. We can do that. But if we do, I can tell you that in the next election, we’ll be talking about some other distraction. And then another one. And then another one. And nothing will change.

[You were the one wanting a race war. John McCain is a war hero. You are a disgrace!]

That is one option. Or, at this moment, in this election, we can come together and say, “Not this time.” This time we want to talk about the crumbling schools that are stealing the future of black children and white children and Asian children and Hispanic children and Native American children.

[Puppet...hey, they are still crumbling. Do you want to know why? I have your answer. Remember, I was a teacher. They are crumbling because the federal dollars you send to the school systems have a tag on them. It says not for use other than technology or books. Guess what...it's a waste of tax dollars. I have a book on this, too. Feeding the Monster. Guess what the Monster is? It'll be out later this year, then you can get educated on the education system.]

This time we want to reject the cynicism that tells us that these kids can’t learn; that those kids who don’t look like us are somebody else’s problem. The children of America are not those kids, they are our kids, and we will not let them fall behind in a 21st century economy. Not this time.

[You are such a hypocrite. The reason we have problems in the school—no political official will ever see this because when a political official visits a school, the school is groomed for the visit. Clinton is the fault of this one. Remember, you beat your kid than you go to jail. That was Clinton. Oh, he retracted 4 years later. Four years to late. Many families were separated because a child got a whipping from a parent and called social services because they were mad. Now, there is no discipline in schools. Punishments are a joke and teachers have ZERO rights so they give up! It's your fault. It's the No Child Left Behind fault. The federal government is a joke when it comes to education. The best thing for all these children is for the federal government to GET OUT the education business because it's your fault that our children are low on the international educational pole! You have no idea what you've done...absolutely none. All your shrinks and fancy numbers people are a waste of tax-payer money and they drive BMWs while the poor black kid and the poor white kid might be sleeping in an old broken down dodge tonight—if their lucky. Idiots!]

This time we want to talk about how the lines in the Emergency Room are filled with whites and blacks and Hispanics who do not have health care; who don’t have the power on their own to overcome the special interests in Washington, but who can take them on if we do it together. This time we want to talk about the shuttered mills that once provided a decent life for men and women of every race, and the homes for sale that once belonged to Americans from every religion, every region, every walk of life. This time we want to talk about the fact that the real problem is not that someone who doesn’t look like you might take your job; it’s that the corporation you work for will ship it overseas for nothing more than a profit.

[Guess who's pushing them overseas...you! You are a hypocrite. Said that already. Instead of allowing all those banks to fail like they should have because they chose to do what they did, you gave them OUR money and now we are in a bind, aren't we? We are not created equal....GET THAT! We are NOT equal. Hitler already tried this...he FAILED and so will you! Americans aren't afraid of war. We aren't afraid to die! You greatly underestimate who we ARE!]

This time we want to talk about the men and women of every color and creed who serve together, and fight together, and bleed together under the same proud flag. [But not you!] We want to talk about how to bring them home from a war that never should’ve been authorized and never should’ve been waged [A Lie...you are doing everything you can to keep them there. You bad mouth a United States President then you turn around and do exactly what he did because you know he was right in the first place. Bush would have brought them home already. Bush made mistakes like every other President in our history, but he was proud of our Country. He cried for our Country. He served our Country. He wasn't afraid to shake a strangers hand or hug a stranger is despair or salute our flag and sang our National Anthem (he knows every word). Bush was a great President because he clearly LOVED America.], and we want to talk about how we’ll show our patriotism by caring for them, and their families, and giving them the benefits they have earned.

[How about mourning them when they die!]

I would not be running for President if I didn’t believe with all my heart that this is what the vast majority of Americans want for this country. [At the time because you LIED to them.] This union may never be perfect [How dare you?], but generation after generation has shown that it can always be perfected. And today, whenever I find myself feeling doubtful or cynical about this possibility, what gives me the most hope is the next generation—the young people whose attitudes and beliefs and openness to change have already made history in this election.

[But you have destroyed the next generation's hopes!]

There is one story in particularly that I’d like to leave you with today—a story I told when I had the great honor of speaking on Dr. King’s birthday at his home church, Ebenezer Baptist, in Atlanta.

There is a young, twenty-three year old white woman named Ashley Baia who organized for our campaign in Florence, South Carolina. She had been working to organize a mostly African-American community since the beginning of this campaign, and one day she was at a roundtable discussion where everyone went around telling their story and why they were there. And Ashley said that when she was nine years old, her mother got cancer. And because she had to miss days of work, she was let go and lost her health care. They had to file for bankruptcy, and that’s when Ashley decided that she had to do something to help her mom.

She knew that food was one of their most expensive costs, and so Ashley convinced her mother that what she really liked and really wanted to eat more than anything else was mustard and relish sandwiches. Because that was the cheapest way to eat. She did this for a year until her mom got better, and she told everyone at the round-table that the reason she joined our campaign was so that she could help the millions of other children in the country who want and need to help their parents, too. Now Ashley might have made a different choice. Perhaps somebody told her along the way that the source of her mother’s problems were blacks who were on welfare and too lazy to work, or Hispanics who were coming into the country illegal [Yeah!]. But she didn’t. She sought out allies in her fight against injustice.

Anyway, Ashley finishes her story and then goes around the room and asks everyone else why they’re supporting the campaign. They all have different stories and reasons. Many bring up a specific issue. And finally they come to this elderly black man who’s been sitting there quietly the entire time. And Ashley asks him why he’s there. And he does not bring up a specific issue. He does not say health care or the economy. He does not say education or the war. He does not say that he was there because of the puppet. He simply says to everyone in the room, “I am here because of Ashley.” “I’m here because of Ashley.” By itself, that single moment of recognition between that young white girl and that old black man is not enough. [That should have told him right there that there is no RACE issue!] It is not enough to give health care to the sick, or jobs to the jobless, or education to our children. But it is where we start. It is where our union grows stronger. And as so many generations have come to realize over the course of the two-hundred and twenty-one years since a band of patriots signed that document in Philadelphia, that is where the perfection begins.

[A little bit more education. Puppet, you should have studied the American people a little bit more. No American President refers to their people by race. They refer to their people as "Every American," "Americans" "Every man, woman and child." Because that's who we are here. We do have our differences and sometimes those differences get pretty colorful...but their OUR differences. We ARE AMERICANS..."EVERY AMERICAN." As a country, we are not white or black, we are AMERICANS. Apparently Oprah and your terrorist buddies didn’t properly inform you of that

To who ever reads this…I apologize to you if I sound disrespectful. I’ll be honest. I don’t recognize this person as my President. Sorry…I know the Constitution and I have served my country and a member of my family has fought in every single war this country has ever been in. I can’t stand by and hold my tongue. ENOUGH is ENOUGH and I know there are plenty of “MEs” out there.

As a Marine who’s job it is to salute this man when he gets off that plane…I wouldn’t. YOU don’t HAVE to do anything. The Military Salute is a sign of respect. By Saluting to him, you are lowering your standards to his level…you are lying about who you are and what you stand for! Don’t let this man and his goons do that to you.

The puppet says he’s a Christian man. I don’t see it. And only God† know if he truly is. But because of HIS failure to lead, failure to do the job he was HIRED by THE PEOPLE to do…he has shown me that he is unworthy. He needs to be fired! The PEOPLE of the United States should call for an IMMEDIATE IMPEACHMENT. Compared to the charges against Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton, the puppet should be put immediately in prison and the key thrown away. So, do understand my “pissed” off attitude. Believe me, it’s not anger. It’s more of a disbelief that good American people would vote for a man because of his skin color and not because of his experience, ethics, character, background, service record, voting record, beliefs, family values, and honor.

I’m more stunned than anything. I have come to terms that a mistake was made. This wrong can be righted. God† didn’t give us…US…our ANCESTORS…this vast, wonderful country just for the sake of it. He knew that every generation that follows no matter if your history includes slavery, persecution, slaughter (my people barely made it)…it doesn’t matter. God† gave this land to them to give to us. Our Ancestors came from everywhere—Europe, Africa, the Islands, the Far East. They came to this new world and struggled and bled for US.

We all have it really nice, and it doesn’t matter if you live in a five-bedroom mansion or a one-bed room shack. We have our freedom. Look around…when the law does come, it’s because you did something suspicious or wrong and they have been given the position as our watchdogs to keep us safe. We all have jobs that help keep us safe…some more important that’s all. So, don’t think just because you’re always in trouble now, you’ll ALWAYS be in trouble. You’ll get through it and the lawmen will stop coming around. Just remember, if you’re an American reading this…you are special. You live in the greatest country in the world. Yes…you do. It’s yours and it’s free. Step outside…take a deep breath…see the sun…see the trees…see people just walking everywhere….hearing someone yelling somewhere (makes you want to yell back)…hear that traffic go by…guess what…that’s freedom. That’s what it looks like.

So, raise your voice. There’s NO Color here…”EVERY AMERICAN!” Get these people out the of OUR White House and take back our freedom by abolishing these crazy, loony laws they’ve been passing behind our backs. Come on, fight with me. I’m not in the condition to care an M16 anymore, but I have words…lots and lots of words.  Come on…I know there’s a lot of rappers, actors, artist, teenage girls, skate boarders, gangsters…all the ones who like NOISE! How about making some NOISE for freedom. Retirees, farmers, firemen, lawmen, soldiers, doctors, nurses, teachers, writers, animal lovers, tree huggers…come with me…MAKE SOME NOISE!!! You have the freedom of SPEECH…Get on a sidewalk, in the middle of a shopping center…in a mall.  Get some blank paper…draw something that stands for being free. Hell-smell print this up and pass it around. We Are AMERICANS! Let’s show the world what this new Millennium of AMERICANS can do! God† Bless. k.

February 2008

8th

Endorses Socialist Candidate Scandal
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

News Alert —Vermont self-described Socialist Congressman Bernie Sanders ran for Senate and the puppet endorsed him. The puppet passed on the  slated Democrat and chose Socialist Sanders. The puppet says he’s an outstanding candidate and only a handful of wrongheaded people don’t like him.

20th

Plagiarism Scandal
by Jonathan Bailey of Plagiarism Today

Typically, I am loathe to enter the world of plagiarism scandals as they are usually off-topic for this site and generally do no good to its readers. However, over the past few days, the puppet plagiarism controversy has dominated my RSS reader with bloggers on both sides using it to attack and defend both candidates in the race. So, rather than let the opportunity slide by, I thought it would be wise to take a look at the scandal, put it in some perspective and see what lessons bloggers and webmasters could learn from it. After all, even though we are not writing campaign speeches, we are putting our words in the most public forum in the world, the web, and many of the same lessons apply.

What Happened—On February 16, the puppet gave a speech in Wisconsin where he answered allegations from his main political rival, Hillary Clinton, that all he had to offer was just words. To answer the charge, he quoted a series of well-known speeches and documents from U.S. history, including those by Martin Luther King, Jr., John F. Kennedy as well as the Declaration of Independence and asked if they were Just Words. Within hours, a clip emerged on YouTube that compared the puppet’s speech to a 2006 speech by Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick. In Patrick’s speech, he used many of the same quotes as well as very similar phrasing. In all, the two clips are remarkably similar.

The Clinton campaign seized on this and accused the puppet of plagiarism. The puppet responded, saying that Patrick and himself are good friends and share ideas regularly. Even Patrick himself, the plagiarized party, has taken to national TV to defend the puppet. However, the puppet has acknowledged that he should have given Patrick credit when speaking, saying, “He (Patrick) had suggested we use these lines. I thought they were good lines. I’m sure I should have. Didn’t this time.” The story has grown to incredible proportions. Google News is reporting over 900 news references for the puppet Plagiarism,  including over 150 unique stories. Perhaps unfortunate for the campaign, the story is not going away and the puppet’s campaign has fired back, accusing Clinton of plagiarizing the puppet’s speeches and catch-phrases. It seems that the back and forth is poised to continue for some time to come.

A Flawed Argumen—Back in 2006, I wrote briefly about plagiarism accusations filed against Martin Luther King, Jr. The conclusion I came to then was that, while the accusations were disconcerting, they were not a reason to abandon his legacy. But it seems that, whenever there is a plagiarism accusation against a public figure, there is a tendency to take things to the extreme. Either the allegations don’t matter at all or they are completely discrediting to everything they have done. The truth, as always, is somewhere in the middle. The accusation against the puppet is that he, with permission from the original author, took ideas from a speech and presented them as his own. Much of the material involved was quoted from previous speeches that are already well-known.

Should the puppet have given credit to his friend? Yes. Does it reflect on his moral character that he didn’t? It is hard to say. It is easy when giving a speech to omit sections. The question is whether it was an honest mistake or an attempt to present the words as something they weren’t. Given that the puppet, by all accounts, had permission to use the verbiage before going up, the evidence leans to the ‘honest mistake’ side. However, only the puppet knows the complete truth. What is clear, however, is that this issue is a distraction. Both sides are hurling plagiarism accusations while not talking about the critical issues of the day. They are smearing one another vigorously over stolen words while ignoring other, more important matters.

Part of the problem is that politicians, for better or worse, are not generally held to the same standard as authors, researchers and artists. Most people realize that the words from a politician are not wholly their own. They have speechwriters, image consultants and others working behind the scenes to help them craft the right message. Does this excuse plagiarism? Not in the least. But it does show that plagiarism accusations in politics are, generally, purely political attacks, especially when they are as questionably grounded as this one. I feel that this not only belittles the issues that are being ignored, but also plagiarism itself. After all, how can lay people take plagiarism seriously when politicians use it as little more than a means to attack each other’s reputation? Sadly, both camps are guilty of that at this point. While I would want to know if a candidate were guilty of widespread and deliberate plagiarism, making a large deal out of permitted plagiarism of a few sentences, especially when the lack of attribution could have been accidental, does no one any good.

Lessons Gleaned—So, what can Webmasters and bloggers learn from this scandal? Well, many of the lessons will be familiar to anyone who reads this site, but they are worth repeating.

Attribute Obsessively—It is not enough to merely attribute up to current standards, one has to go above and beyond. Not only does it make such scandals much less likely, but it provides proof of good faith when and if an omission does happen. Though not everyone’s words are under the same scrutiny as the puppet, pretend that they are.

Get Permission—Though the puppet appears to have had permission to use the words he did and it didn’t avert the scandal, imagine how much different it would be if Patrick hadn’t spoken up and said that the puppet had clearance to use the words. It was a wise move by the puppet.

Incidental Plagiarism Still Counts—The plagiarized portion was only a few sentences, but either the memory of someone on the Web or advanced search tools were able to detect the plagiarism. The fact that it is only a few sentences or not a direct quote doesn’t mean much. The plagiarism can be found so long as it is recognizable. Take nothing for granted.

In the end, it comes down to the same tried and true system of always attributing any content that you use, no matter how small, and always showing respect for the words of others, even if you have permission to use them. Though this is much easier to do in print than in a speech. It is even more important as the words we write are more easily searched and parsed than the words we say.

Conclusions—Having seen so much plagiarism over the past six years of my life, the puppet scandal certainly seems to be on the more minor end of the spectrum. Especially when compared to the Joseph Biden scandal from the late 80′s, the use of a few short sentences, with permission from the original author, seems almost petty. This isn’t to say that the puppet is excused for his actions, just that there are clearly bigger fish to fry. The exposure by the Clinton campaign seems to be motivated solely by politics, as is the puppet’s counter-attack and that belittles both the ongoing issues and the nature of plagiarism itself. Though I am clearly against plagiarism and have no sharp political opinions about the puppet or Clinton, I think the Nation, and indeed the world, would be better served if the issue were dropped in favor of the topics that matter more in the election. Furthermore, the excitement over this case can be seen by some as a slap in the face. With so many authors and artists struggling with widespread and unwelcome plagiarism, all of the attention on a case of incidental and permitted reuse is almost insulting. No matter what you think of the puppet or his actions, there are clearly worse copycats out there and many others far more deserving of the title plagiarist.

January 2008

1st

Emil Jones Scandal
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

APThe puppet’s political Godfather, the man who taught the puppet all he knows, Jones “is known for steering State money to favored institutions, including some that employ his relatives. Several of his relatives have gotten State jobs, and his wife’s Government salary jumped 60 percent after he became Senate President. He has played an important role in blocking ethics legislation in Illinois.”

Raila Odinga Scandal
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

Some claim then U.S. Senator puppet campaigned for infamous Kenyan Dictator Raila Odinga. They certainly appeared together. Snopes says the two men are not cousins, the puppet did not donate money to Odinga and the puppet is not a Moslem. Those are rumors related to this appearance.

8th

Saul Alinsky Training Scandal
by Peter Andrew of ConservativeAmerican.org

The American ThinkerThe puppet’s early mentor in the Alinsky Rules for radicals Socialist method was Mike Kruglik, who said of the puppet—”He was a natural, the undisputed master of agitation, who could engage a room full of recruiting targets in a rapid-fire Socratic dialogue, nudging them to admit that they were not living up to their own standards. As with the panhandler, he could be aggressive and confrontational. With probing, sometimes personal questions, he would pinpoint the source of pain in their lives, tearing down their egos just enough before dangling a carrot of hope that they could make things better.”

The Thinker further reported—The agitator’s job, according to Alinsky, is first to bring folks to the realization that they are indeed miserable, that their misery is the fault of unresponsive governments or greedy corporations, then help them to bond together to demand what they deserve, and to make such an almighty stink that the dastardly governments and corporations will see imminent self-interest in granting whatever it is that will cause the harassment to cease. The puppet called this being a Community Organizer!