Tag Archives: Freedom

Republicans Verses Conservatives

     I have a thing with political parties. George Washington warned of parties saying it would split our country. Not even a year later, John Adams (whom I greatly admire) failed Washington and the American people on this one aspect—instead of following in Washington’s footsteps, he ran on party; thus, beginning this tragic fall of the American free election process.
    
I’m no expert as per say—I’m not a politician. I’m an outsider looking in. I guess you can say I’m an expert as a member of the People of this country. I am a registered Republican. So What?
    
In my view: the Republicans and the Democrats are one in the same. Take a closer look at the 2008 election if you’re questioning my judgment. Some advice—read Sarah Palin’s books. If you’re an enemy of Palin, then you’ve been sucked up by this Republican-Democrat machine. They both smeared a good woman.
    
Newsmax’s (Feb. 2012 Issue) article What Romney Must do to Woo Conservatives by David A. Patten (pages 8-9) proves my notion. Patten gives us a list of how Mitt Romney can woo conservatives:

     The first: Emphasize his conservative fiscal record in Massachusetts

  • He took a $3 billion budge shortfall and left a $2 billion rainy-day fund.
  • He dropped Massachusetts’ unemployment from 5.6 to 4.6 percent.
  • He attempted to reduce state income taxes.

The second: Talk up his business background—

  • He’s widely credited for rescuing the 2002 Winter Olympic Games.
  • He founded Bain Capital which helped rebuild The Sports Authority, Domino’s Pizza and Staples.

The Third: Reach out to conservatives

  • Stop being indifferent, if not hostile, to social conservatives.
  • Reach out to them and show he genuinely cares about their heartfelt cause.

The Forth: Emphasize electability at every turn

  • Patten states—“electability [of a candidate running for the President of the United States] may be just as important to conservatives this cycle as ideological purity is.”
  • Romney argues he has a superior organization and funding machine. Patten states that he should continue to play this card.

Now let’s put this in prospective by comparing Romney to Palin—

  • Sarah Palin, according to her book, fought against corruption in Alaska before she was governor. She went against the top—all the way to the governor’s mansion—and WON.
  • As governor, she achieved getting the Alaskan pipeline finished within what six months; completing a deal that was going on for 50years.
  • She not only got Alaska out of debt but left a huge surplus, plus every Alaskan who lives there two years are more receives $2,000 a year from the pipeline.
  • She handled all those BIG oil men by tearing up contracts and telling them how they’d do things in her state. She put Alaska in charge instead of the other way around like here in Louisiana. We have countless pipelines and we don’t see a dime!
  • She genuinely cares about America and its citizens.
  • She did these things plus more and at the same time was raising children and managing her own household. Instead of having chauffeurs and fancy limousines and countless maids, to help her state, she did everything herself.
  • Alaska is 1/4 the size of the entire lower 48 and she managed while doing all of the above to visit all of her people not just some.

     How does Romney get to be better than her? Is it because she is a woman? Does that make her less valuable? I was surprised that liberal women organizations did not rally her. How hypocritical!
     During the 2008 campaign, the Republicans did every effort to control this much achieved, true American woman. They went as far as writing her speeches (telling her what to say). Her comment about being a soccer mom and the lip-stick comment, got her heavily reprimanded by her very own Republican team mates. She wore her own jacket at one event and she was reprimanded for that, too.  The Republican party bought all new clothes for her including $70 panty hose which she never wore then demanded that she return them after the election. And you want to talk about wasteful spending! They even reprimanded her for talking directly to the People on her campaign trail.
     To put it simple. The Republican party told her how to walk, talk, eat, s…., and breathe. That’s not democratic or a republic, that’s authoritarian to the core.
     Then after the campaign the Republican party did everything they could to destroy this true American lady’s reputation, guaranteeing she’d never win an election again.
     According to Patten’s article—“the Republicans can thank most for their laser-beam focus on electability is none other than Barrack Obama himself…Contrast [Republicans, today, wanting to oust Obama] this with 2008, when some GOP voters openly mused that Obama might be better than McCain” [a prisoner of war, and a schooled politician having more creditability and on-the-job experience than the puppet!].
     Patten states that Romney is going after the conservatives to win the GOP election then he’ll switch to the middle to win the presidential elections. Does this mean he’ll lie, cheat, steal (do what ever he can) to win over the conservatives?
     I think the whole Republican selection of a candidate is bogus. This country was founded on conservative values and God was always at the forefront of building this great nation. How absurd to ignore Ron Paul! He is the most qualified of all these men. What he has to say aligns with what Palin stands for and what our founders wanted—America is supposed to be a free country with a small government. That’s their message—plain and simple.
     How gullible of the American people to allow these two people to escape their grasp. Even Herman Cain had a true American heart. His statement that he was NOT an African-American but an American was the greatest, most honest, true statement any black man except for King has said.
     Patten mentions serial flip-floppers. I see nothing but flip-floppers. Ron Paul seems to be the only exception. Herman Cain and Sarah Palin—without a doubt stuck to their beliefs as well.
     History shows us where this country has gone astray. Many warnings were given from those who built this great nation:

  • Don’t let outsiders in (meaning foreigners) was the most important.
  • If the federal government got too big and out of control, the People has the right to override it: taking it by force if necessary.

     My questions still go unanswered:

  • Where are all the true Americans?
  • Where are all those tea party people who rallied and rallied?
  • Were all those speeches and signs held just words?
  • Why does the NRA HAVE to fight for the Second Amendment, which allows Americans to protect themselves?
  • Why does Americans have to fight to keep a federal government health take-over which states that they have the right to dictate weather you die or live?
  • Why has this country not impeached the puppet? After all—
  • he’s bowed to kings,
  • he’s disrespected our allies,
  • he’s disrespected the very country he represents by calling us arrogant and apologizes for us being that way,
  • he’s supported terrorism,
  • he’s lied about who he really is,
  • he’s spent more of our tax dollars than any president we’ve had,
  • he has more czars (people we didn’t elect, people who answer to no one but the president; and we pay for them) than any other president,
  • he’s written a book about his hate for white people and his hate for America before he was elected,
  • he’s placed moslems into our government (people who hate the United States of American and who intend to destroy us),
  • he’s criticized American Veterans and has treated American soldiers with total disrespect,
  • he’s weakened our defense,
  • I’m so there’s more…

     He’s so disliked in Southern Louisiana that when he came here (it took him 2 weeks to come) for our tragic oil spill, not one person stood on the side of the road to greet him. NOT ONE!
     The American People have failed our founders, have failed their sacrifices for us to be free. We ARE not a democratic nation and far from being a republic. If you think we are than check out the electoral college, make a list of all the laws and regulations that control everything in your life. Go on, review your income tax form—take a look at how much you and your boss has to pay just on you and convert that to percent. It’s over 12%.
     Republican and Democrat politicians don’t care about America. They just care about personal advancement. Just look at how much they make a year, look at all their benefits, look at how much vacation time they have, check out their homes, their clothes, their staff, maids, cooks, etc.
     How many of you have a limousine or $1,000 suits or a retirement paid by the People. Most of us don’t have any retirement.
     Wake Up! America. That’s the sign I like the most after Next time We’ll Come with Guns.
     Romney is no better than the puppet. You are sleeping if you don’t see it. My suggestion—get rid of them all and regroup. Further suggestions—

  • shut down the government
  • seal the borders
  • throw out every controlling law
  • sell all these government luxuries
  • void every government agency
  • increase our defense (take pride in those who volunteer to defend us)
  • return the National Guard back to their states
  • return our tax money back its original intention
  • oust the electoral college (return the voting and decisions back to the People—as it was meant to be)
  • deport all individuals who aren’t American citizens
  • stop importing cheap foreign products and return to American Made (Americans take pride in their work and make things that LAST!)
  • oust political parties and return the fight for positions back to the individual
  • return education (schools) back to the communities
  • the most important—return God to the forefront of this nation
  • strengthen the rules of political candidates
  • change the citizenship immediately to—they must be at least a two-generation American with no exceptions
  • presidential candidates must have at least four years of military service
  • the age of the president should be increased to 50
  • presidential candidates must have at least 10 years experience in leadership (the actual running or leading of a major organization—city, town, large corporation, etc.); disregarding all congressional time except for two years
  • limiting congressional terms to two
  • cutting congressional pay by 3/4
  • cutting all government vehicles (they can use their own car like we do) and planes except for Air Force One
  • cut totally, except for the president and vice president, all retirement and health benefits paid by the People, including those already retired (we have to pay for ours—let them pay for theirs)

     A reorganization is necessary and it can’t be of anyone’s benefit if it takes years and years to do it. It needs to be done immediately. The American People can handle it. Those that complain and gripe are NOT true Americans and can have the option—either stand behind The United States of America or find another country to call home.
     It’s that simple. You, the American People, make it complicated. Your arguments are hypocritical! You want to be free but you can’t handle what it takes to be free.
     Mitt Romney is not the answer. The cycle will just continue, and the United States of America will cease to exist and you, the American People, will have been the fool.
     These elections are not that important to me. I think we are overlooking the real problem. The U. S. government has gotten too big, and we are just standing by while it continues to grow. We need to return to our beginning. But, I guess, if the People don’t want it, then maybe we should just go ahead and throw in the towel and declare ourselves (as we truly are) a socialist nation and let the government totally tell us what to do. I guess, to most, that is the simplest way to live. After all, anything that is too hard is not worth doing—so if being free is too hard, we might as well give it up right now instead of all this bickering and fighting. It’s getting redundant and quite boring.

Black Americans: Useful Idiots?

A Southern girl looking outside the box. That’s how I see myself. Part of what I see when it comes to this “race” issue is this: Back in the ’70′s (I was in middle school) we had riots in our schools because some idiot up north decided that there would be no more white and black schools; they’d be just one school. Why did we have the riots? Because we were black and white. We were different and we were thrown into situations that we didn’t know how to respond to on the immediate level that was expected of us. I keep a set of encyclopedias in my living room from Reed High School (the black high school when there were two high schools) to remind me, as well as my children, that we are indeed different (“blacks and whites” as the north portrays us) but we share a culture like none other in the world; and here when things are in an upheaval, I have their back just as much as they have mine.

Today, I see no such tensions as I experienced in middle school. It is easy for me to stand in line, be it waiting for a fast-food order or stamps at the post office, and strike up a conversation with whoever is before or behind me. Color is no preference but I do prefer the Cajun types.

I don’t see color as the government sees color, and I believe that the majority of the South feel the same. I hate when I have to fill out a form and they ask me if I’m white, black, Hispanic, etc. I have come to check off other because I’m neither of the above. I’m Cajun! I’m NOT Caucasian for damn sure. My family originated from France, Scotland and Germany (mostly France and Scotland). But I would never dare refer to myself as French-American. I’m a lot like Cain. I’m American. I would never refer to black Cajuns as African-Americans. NEVER! To me, that’s an insult on their Southern culture. We here in Southern Louisiana, born and raised through deep rooted generations, no matter if we worked on a plantation or in a grocery store, we are ALL Cajuns. Down here, our skin color has nothing to do with who we are.

What this video below teaches is the truth and the truth hurts. “Brainwashing” (Cain’s straight-up observation) is the most accurate. All those radical liberals who constantly use color to change laws, to add laws, to suppress truth’s voice…I don’t see them coming to the South. And for damn sure I don’t see the president campaigning here in the South. Why is that? Makes you wonder, doesn’t it?

Watch this video and tell me I’m wrong.

Democrats See Black Americans as Useful Idiots

Paid-For Benefits Deemed Entitlements?

post sent via email by Geno Ledet

[Oh, what web we weave! Mr. Ledet is dead-on target with this one. The saddest part of it is that no one is raising enough hell about this. Debate, debate, debate without any action! Corruption at its best.]

I paid—Didn’t You?

The only thing wrong with this calculation is they forgot to figure in the people who died before they collected their social security! Where did that money go? This is another example of what Rick Perry called “treason in high places!”

Remember, not only did you contribute to Social Security but your employer did, too. It totaled 15% of your income before taxes. If you averaged only $30K over your working life, that’s close to $220,500. If you calculate the future value of $4,500 per year (your’s & your employer’s contribution) at a simple 5% (less than what the govt. pays on the money that it borrows), after 49 years of working you’d have $892,919.98.

If you took out only 3% per year, you’d receive $26,787.60 per year and it would last better than 30 years (until you’re 95 if you retire at age 65) and that’s with no interest paid on that final amount on deposit! If you bought an annuity and it paid 4% per year, you’d have a lifetime income of $2,976.40 per month.

The folks in Washington  have pulled off a bigger Ponzi scheme than Bernie Madhoff ever had.

Entitlement my ass, I paid cash for my social security insurance! Just because they borrowed the money, doesn’t make my benefits some kind of charity or handout! Congressional benefits—free healthcare, outrageous retirement packages, 67 paid holidays, three weeks paid vacation, unlimited paid sick days, now that’s welfare, and they have the nerve to call my social security retirement entitlements!

We’re “broke” and can’t help our own seniors, veterans, orphans, homeless. In the last months we have provided aid to Haiti, Chile, and Turkey. And now  Pakistan—home of bin Laden. Literally billions of dollars!

Our retired seniors living on a fixed income receive no aid nor do they get any breaks while our government and religious organizations pour hundreds of billions of dollars and tons of food to foreign countries!

They call Social Security and Medicare entitlements even though most of us have been paying for it all our working lives and now when it’s time for us to collect, the government is running out of money. Why did the government borrow from it in the first place? Imagine if the GOVERNMENT gave US the same support they give to other countries!

Sad isn’t it?

Defacing American Dollars

A lady in Monte Vista, CO had this dollar bill. This is her story.
You don’t think we’re in a  war?

These are starting to show up around  our country! After dinner she took a $1 dollar bill out of her  purse and displayed it on the table.  Underneath the words “In God  We Trust” someone had stamped the dollar bill in red ink:

NO GOD BUT  ALLAH

We asked her where she had gotten this dollar bill. She said  it was part of her change in Alamosa , CO. We took a picture of her  dollar bill. If anyone tries to give you one of these dollar bills as  change, please refuse it and ask them to give you a dollar bill  that has not been defaced.

God bless our USA!
IN GOD WE TRUST!

Newt Gingrich Defends Sarah Palin

Now here is honesty at the core. Presidential Candidate Newt Gingrich tells it straight to an MSNBC report.

Newt Gingrich Defends Sara Palin

 

The Enemy Inside the Wire

post by Frank J. Gaffney, Jr. (President of the Center for Security Policy, a columnist for the Washington Times and host of the nationally syndicated program, Secure Freedom Radio, heard in Washington weeknights at 9:00 p.m. on WRC 1260 AM)

[I commented on this blog over and over about this but got no attention. Perhaps this is a beginning of what you as Americans refuse to acknowledge: the next Crusade!]

What would have happened if, during the Cold War, Soviet intelligence had been responsible for training Americans charged with countering communist aggression?  Surely, we would not have defeated the USSR. Perhaps, instead, Kruschev’s boast that his nation would dance on our graves would have been realized.

It should, therefore, be profoundly alarming that, today, the Obama administration is entrusting to agents of the Moslem Brotherhood (MB or Ikhwan in Arabic) the responsibility for approving who and what is used in “countering violent extremism” training for our military, law enforcement, intelligence personnel. The use of the term “countering violent extremism” (or CVE) is, of course, the first clue that the enemy is inside the wire.  That euphemism is the term Team Obama allows to be employed in lieu of phrases that actually describe the nature of the principal enemy we face at the moment: Moslems who engage in holy war—jihad—to compel the rest of us to submit to the totalitarian, supremacist political-military-legal doctrine they call shariah.

“Countering violent extremism” is problematic for reasons beyond its lack of clarity about the threat.  It also explicitly excludes a facet of the menace posed by shariah that is at least as dangerous to an open, tolerant liberal democracy as the violent sort of jihad: the stealthy insinuation of this doctrine in ways that are non-violent or, more accurately, pre-violent.

The Moslem Brotherhood specializes in this sort of covert warfare, which it has dubbed “civilization jihad.” Its skills were honed during decades of operations under a succession of hostile Egyptian governments. Now that the Brothers have achieved—with no little help from Obama—the overthrow of the last of these under Hosni Mubarak, their true colors are becoming evident.  Ask the Coptic Christians who are now being massacred by the putatively “non-violent” Ikhwan.

Make no mistake: Stealthy civilization jihad is every bit as toxic and has precisely the same goals as the sort of holy war we have come to associate with murderous hijackers and suicide bombers of MB spin-offs like al Qaeda.

We know, for example, from evidence introduced uncontested by federal prosecutors in the 2008 Holy Land Foundation terrorism-funding trial that the Brotherhood’s mission here is “a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying… Western civilization from within… by their hands [read, ours] and the hands of the believers so that God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”  We also are on notice that the MB has a five-phased plan for achieving this mission in the United States; the first four phases are stealthy and pre-violent. Which brings us to the alarming guidelines recently promulgated by the Department of Homeland Security for countering violent extremism training. Under the heading “Trainers should be expert and well-regarded,” the DHS directs that a “prospective trainer’s resume be “check[ed] with knowledgeable community leaders.”  Unfortunately, it appears that, as far as the Obama administration is concerned, such “leaders” are exclusively those associated with organizations that the federal government and the Moslem Brotherhood itself have identified as Ikhwan fronts. The DHS guidelines also direct that “training should be sensitive to constitutional values.”  To that end, it requires that “federal, state and local government and law enforcement officials organizing CVE training…review the training program to ensure that:

  • “It uses examples to demonstrate that terrorists and violent extremists vary in ethnicity, race, gender, and religion.
  • “Training should focus on behavior, not appearance or membership in particular ethnic or religious communities.
  • “Training should support the protection of civil rights and civil liberties as part of national security. Don’t use training that equates religious expression, protests, or other constitutionally protected activity with criminal activity.”

In other words, Muslim Brotherhood-associated individuals are being afforded the opportunity to veto the use of trainers who might actually understand the nature of the danger its operatives and organizations pose to our country. And those who are allowed to train are not permitted to focus their students on the actual threat emanating from a subset of the Moslem community.  Rather, they must promote the notion that there are really no indicators in belief or nationality that can help the authorities apply limited security resources in a sensibly prioritized manner. Some try to excuse this behavior as nothing more than being “sensitive,” “tolerant” or “politically correct.”  The danger is that shariah-adherent Moslems regard such conduct as submissive—and, according to their doctrine, they are obliged to redouble their efforts to, as the Koran puts it, make us “feel subdued.”  That means more violence, not less.

That prospect becomes all the greater when one adds into the mix the presence of government officials who are themselves tied to the Moslem Brotherhood and/or its shariah doctrine—including in senior positions in the White House, the State Department and the Department of Homeland Security.  Such individuals are products of and greatly facilitate the Brothers‘ influence operations and contribute greatly to our failure to date to recognize, let alone counteract, them.

If we would not have won the Cold War had the KGB been able to call the shots here, we surely will not prevail if we allow the Moslem Brotherhood to do the same in the struggle against today’s totalitarian ideology, shariah—a doctrine some have dubbed “communism with a god.”  Congressional oversight is urgently needed to prevent that from happening.

 

 

Where’s The People’s Voice

post by Michael Krull, Newt 2012, Campaign Manager

[What Mr. Krull talks about below has already begun. In earlier post on this blog, I repeatedly talked about this, posted articles about this, now it's our reality. Here it goes: My son is in the Louisiana National Guard. One of his best friends swore the oath about seven weeks ago. He went through his physical at MEPS and then a week after his wedding, he was shipped off to Fort Jackson, South Carolina (my old stomping ground) for basic. In less than a week, him as well as over 200 other newbees were summoned into a large room to be told that they were being immediately discharged. My son's friend was told he had ADD and could not serve. So, while the other soldiers began their basic training, these 200+ young men had to sit around for five weeks to be out processed. That's right FIVE weeks. Here's how volunteers for freedom are treated!]

In just seven days, the super committee is required to present a bipartisan agreement to Congress and, in what should be a shocking development, word yesterday is that they were working on a “two-part solution” or, as Rep. XavierBecera commented, a “multi-part solution.” Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta warned that the trigger to slash defense spending by $600 billion if a deal could not be reached would lead to the smallest ground force since 1940, the smallest number of ships since 1915, and the smallest Air Force in its history! This would cripple our military right in the middle of serious global unrest!

That a “super committee” was formed with triggers that would literally cripple our ability to protect our interests around the world is unforgivable, and the direct result of failed leadership. With a gun pointed toward things as important as Medicare and Defense, this president has the audacity to go to Australia and proclaim that “this region is going to be the engine of economic growth for a long time.” This, following comments by the puppet that Americans are “a little bit lazy.”  This country is suffering from a severe lack of competent leadership, and the only solution is to force the puppet to defend his radical policies.

Interesting

Interesting, 2011
by k. e. leger

around the corner
a presidential campaign
all seems insane
ignoring obvious
merry-go-round’s
circling game
a magician’s
hand in hat

now you see
now you don’t

who’s the bigger
challenging cat

travel the circuit
wave to a crowd
promises said aloud
norm’s ancient way
for truth—lie debate

all’s the same
—this american campaign
amongst the republican’s honest name

forgotten, simple frame
tricking the human brain

—manipulation
easy psychological claim

pictures
tv

clear—plain

obama’s found a way
saudi arabia’s inventing play

insert moslems
high in american government clay

cripple finances
don’t let them see
what’s real—what’s fake

push a government hand
as hitler did say
medical needs
do take

weaken strength
values—morals

scramble their minds
debates
do create
topics at heart
they’ll concentrate

on with the game
time
to entertain

osama bin laden
george w
chased in vain

elections—
obama’s campaign
sudden capture
furthering
illusion’s train

elite navy seal’s
short-time celebrated fame
without open-view proof
wrapped in cellophane
into the ocean
laden was drained

then a heated flame
seal’s to maim
covered tracks
down from the sky
they did rain

desperation—
iran’s 2012′s flame
islam’s praised ialm
waiting to reign

weak magical trick
time to top it

gaddafi to hang
let’s mix america’s brain
over and over
different game
opened wide
time to entertain

hidden in a pipe
a way to escape

here’s illusion’s cape

now you see
now you don’t

after failed gains
excited moslems
across the sands
democracy we won’t
amercia please help

those once hailing
an early past
americans easily slain

egypt’s public game
for the brotherhood’s reign

obama praised
terrorists controlled terrain
we must be diplomatic
we must see them sane
instead of wanting to hang

this gaddafi game
seems too—
a bit lame

powerful mass killer
disappearing—
protecting his reign
a game
he easily sang

then in a drain
not running
but curled like a soup terrain
from death to burial
american eyes
coveted with lies

obama’s continued campaign
no promises to make
in the american brain
a better way to take

that’s there
his merry-go-round fair
not on his own
could he be so strong
too much
could go wrong
who could help
this clone
he couldn’t do it alone

only a middle eastern power
could hold this tower
only big money
could help this phony

then over here
illusive american game
coveting his beginning frame

home gardens illegal
heavily tax the farmer’s market

the mrs could tame
public attention
on american gardens
a book to mask
what hubby tried to slay
changing the slate
american farmers
—votes to sway

all to entertain
twist the american brain
high burning
psychological flame

no need to strain
it’s all clear—plain

sudden voice’s claim

job-creating plan
remortgage—lower rate
help this struggling land
illusions all the same
government to own
more american homes
taken
through illusion’s game
more private assets
right behind american backs

around
does go
this merry-go-round

two different campaigns

history remains
history maimed

wish-washy brain

as 2012 quickly gains
its days
one by one
will fad
as americans
watch football
play video games
as the romans
all’s the same
play with the brain
—entertain
covet who’s to blame
’til we’re thrown
into a fire’s flame

Erase the Hypocrisy, Please!

post by k. e. leger

You know I’m so sick and tired of the phrases conservative movement and grass roots. The United States of America was founded on Christian values that once upon a time took morals, values, and loyalty to their country very serious. Radical liberals were not accepted. In my opinion, whoever came up with these phrases are not true Americans in any since of the word. With that said, on with the 2012 campaign.

Ridiculous. The only word for it.

Conference in Louisiana after Oil Spill. Notice there's no flags. No U.S. President has ever forgotten the flags!

Candidate (so-sure-of-himself) #1—As anyone who reads my opinions here knows, the puppet shouldn’t even be in the Oval Office. He should have never been elected, but since he has (or placed), he should have been impeached that first year. My argument is strong here. Just read this site and you will understand the footing on which I stand.

Like many others I was floored after the November 2010 election. We called for impeachment but nothing happened. But then things cleared up, for me anyway. If you paid attention to who got elected, you would have noticed that many seats were incumbents (meaning, of course, that they were reelected—furthering their careers as politicians which should be a no, no since we taxpayers fit the bill.)

These incumbents were the ones (including the puppet) who signed the stimulus package of 2008. Remember that? It doesn’t seem like many people paid much attention to who was getting the money. AIG was one. Did you know that? Well, did you also know that AIG supports the Islamic world-destructive views? No, well, just do a little research and you will find that this company refuses to do business with Christians or any company or person associated with Christianity. That’s right! Okay, put a little sense in that one and you get the United States Congress giving money to support terrorism. That’s a big assumption but yet if they don’t do business with Christians, then who are they doing business with and who owns them? Check out what Insurance Journey and The Voice Magazine has to say about this issue.

So, I would assume that none of these Congress members who signed this package would want to face treason charges; and, since we have a president who is highly questionable in every aspect of his life, it would be right to assume there was some blackmail going on behind closed doors. “Impeach me and I’ll make sure everyone knows what you did!” I would not put it pass this puppet master because he lacks any kind of character.

Another question I keep asking myself is—should a president of the United States be campaigning 1 1/2 years before an election? Shouldn’t he be running the country instead? Shouldn’t he be protecting the country? Just wondering because I think it lacks a considerable amount of character to be doing what the puppet is doing.

For the other contenders. Here’s where my comment above about conservative movement comes into play. Humm.

How many times has he been married? A liar, a cheater, a traitor.

Candidate Prospect #2—Shouldn’t Trump be running on the Democratic ticket since he so proudly announced how he made more money on one transaction, that of renting American soil to a dictator who supports terrorism, than he did all year? Then he tried to cover his a…

As reported by Ryan Witt on examiner.com—”Donald Trump tried to justify his relative recent business dealings with Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi.  Yesterday, Donald Trump boasted about how he screwed Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi in some business dealings.  Critics questioned whether Trump should be profiting at all off of a known supporter of terrorism who has since become infamous for his brutal rule over his own people. …[A] CNN interviewer then asks if he gave Gaddafi’s money to charity. Trump goes on to claim that he did, in fact, donate the money he made off of Gaddafi to charity.”

Then he changed his story stating to Timothy Christopher of Mediate that he  “made it impossible for Gaddafi to rent the property, but instead it was local government officials.” Then he states that he didn’t know who he was renting the property to—”Trump claimed that he did not know it was Gaddafi who was renting the property. At the time, Trump claimed he thought the property was being leased to the United Arab Emirates, with no connection to Gaddafi.”

The joke’s on us. Of course, American politics has become a joke all around the world. We can easily be manipulated and deceived. Oh, and taken advantage of . Is Trump just playing around with us, too? South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, a Republican, says to NewsMax—“Anybody that thinks he’s doing this for name recognition—that’s just not true. He’s very serious about it and he’s convinced he can win.” Now remember that he rented American property to a terrorist and dictator. Was there a deal made under the table? Think about it. Trump proudly announced that he made more money in that one transaction then in a whole year! Trump’s a very rich man. Does anyone know how much he made last year? It is reported that he is worth $2.9 billion.

So, better yet, should he be running for the President of the United States at all? He’s rich. Okay. And? That’s all that I see. Sure he built himself an empire in business. Oh, boo-hoo. That doesn’t make him worthy of being an American President. Did he hold any public service office? I mean maybe the public would vote for him since the puppet got in office with hardly any public service experience along with having friendships with Islamic terrorist criminals. Maybe Americans just don’t care to be free anymore.

Another point about Trump is—Just because he stirred up mess about the puppet’s birth certificate doesn’t makes him credible. The people should have taken care of that from the start. No, take that back, the United States Judicial system should have done this. And, once they failed to do their job, then the people should have stepped up to the plate and called for recalls across the board. That’s how it is suppose to be done. Now they are looking up to a traitor because he’s got enough money to do so? How absurd!

If she runs and if she does what she did for Alaska, America would say farewell to all those who want to destroy her because she would regain her power.

Presumed Candidate #3—Tell me Sarah Palin doesn’t have experience and you’d be a liar. She has a lot of experience. What she did for Alaska is amazing. Why wouldn’t she make a good candidate? Because she is a strong Christian? Oh, yeah, the moslums in Washington wouldn’t like that one because she would interrupt their take-over plans! That’s the only reason I see that would be anyone’s reason to not support her. After all, there’s no one else willing to step up to the plate that’s worthy enough. Isn’t that true?

But still there’s still mess. NewsMax reports “a battery of recent polls that suggest her once sky-high popularity is plummeting on many key fronts—among Republicans and independents, for example, as well as Alaskans.” Very interesting. I guess these poll takers didn’t read her books. I did. Maybe Palin should create her own ticket. After what she witnessed during the 2008 campaign, I doubt that either party—Republicans and Democrats—value the Constitution much anymore. George Washington was right on the mark when he said that parties bring only corruption and separation. I mean no one seems to be questioning why Americans aren’t voting for people who really care about our ways and our laws; instead, they are voting (or something else) people in office that really hate this wonderful country!

Career Politician!

Candidate #4—And who’s Rep. Michele Bachmann? Here’s what NewsMax had to say, “Somewhat surprisingly, Bachmann may be the trio’s most serious candidate—at least, her recent fundraising suggests she is. The three-term congresswoman raised $2.2 million in the first quarter of 2011, according to her newly released Federal Election Commission filings. Of that total, $1.7 million came from her congressional committee, and $500,000 from her political action committee. She even outpaced former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who’s noted for his fundraising strengths and is viewed by many as the party’s 2012 frontrunner. Romney raised $1.9 million in the first quarter of this year…Indeed, political insiders say Bachmann has distinguished herself from Palin and other GOP candidates by walking the walk with tea party activists. “She’s got so much money, and she’s a true believer. And she’s beaten the odds, repeatedly,” Sabato said. “She’s egged on by the media in a different way than Palin. Palin gets irritated, while Bachmann gets even. And she gets even by running.””

Let’s not keep making mistakes. First, a 3-term congresswoman? Power. That’s all I see. While the American people are continuously financing her life style, she’s gaining power and living high on the hog. Aren’t we tired of this? Weren’t Republicans trying to limit congressional terms to 2, and yet, they are supporting a 3-term candidate? Do you see the hypocrisy?

That’s the candidates. So far I haven’t seen any democrats stepping up to take on the hate-Americans agenda puppet.

The plot thickens. Now, there’s all this BS about the tea parties. As NewsMax stated “all three would-be candidates are forcing tea party activists to make some important decisions as they try to grow into a more enduring force in American politics.”

I don’t think you can force anyone to do anything. The tea party Americans are for what this country is suppose to be about—loyalty to God†, loyalty to the country, less taxes, and freedom. So, why is there so much hype about them? After all, we are all suppose to be Americans. After all, everyone living here claiming their citizenship by birth or other are enjoying all that America stands for. Shouldn’t everyone be fighting for the same thing?

My point is that when ideas like those the tea party goers had when they first began change radically, I begin to wonder who’s telling the truth. Newsmax reports that “early polls suggest that Trump is dominating the GOP field—among Tea Party activists and more mainstream Republican voters. A new PPP poll showed Trump leading his nearest GOP competitor by 9 points. (That’s likely a result of Trump’s towering name recognition; according to a Pew Research Center survey released Wednesday, 39 percent of Republicans named him as the potential candidate they’ve heard the most about lately. That was more than all other candidates—combined).”

Who’s giving and taking these polls? You mean to tell me that the very people who rallied for the Constitution are going to support a man who rented American land to a terrorist? I don’t believe that one for a second. I see the press pushing their agenda on innocent people. Again!

After all, the press pushed the puppet. They made him look like a saint while bashing a true, Christian (honest) candidate. They even went as far as turning the State of Alaska against her. Is this jealousy? Then the press made the puppet look like he was the next best thing to the invention of bread while bashing a war hero who honored America enough to suffer torture instead of giving up secrets! The press is known for supporting the release of secret information as they did during the Bush years after 9/11 putting the United States citizens at risk, not even thinking or caring about their actions. So, why do Americans even trust them anymore? They are not sticking to the ethics of true journalism. I bet over half of them don’t know what the word objectivity means. It’s all about fame and money!

I’m disappointed to say the least. We, as Americans, should have already recalled over half of the judicial branch and most of congress, and we should have forced the impeachment of the puppet. But no one is doing anything! My own family hates the fact that I write about politics and refuses to hear me when I talk about it. That says a lot to me.

We have lost the meaning of being an American. We have forgotten those who sacrificed for the freedoms we have. We are willing to give up the Constitution and our freedom so we don’t have to struggle with making decisions. “Oh, let someone else do it!” is the mind-set of today’s American. Oh, what a sad, sad world this is.

It’s time to step up to the plate. Put fear behind us and just do it! It’s now or never. Have American anyone?

Economic Recover: 100% Fake

post by Robert Wiedemer, MoneyNews.com

That’s right. The recovery is a fake. It is completely a result of massive increases in government borrowing. The cheerleaders like to tell you that the economy has rebounded. We had government stimulus earlier, but now animal spirits have taken over and it is running on its own. Hah! The recovery is only stimulus.

Let’s look at the numbers—In 2007, the GDP was $14.0 trillion. In 2010, the GDP was $14.6 trillion. That’s a net increase of $600 billion—$600 billion in 3 years is not good, but it is a rebound that is at least slightly above inflation.

Will the Stock Market Plunge 50% (or More)—Taking Your Retirement With It? Click Here

However, let’s compare that to the increase in government borrowing.
  • In 2007, the U.S. government borrowed and spent $163 billion.
  • In 2010, the U.S. government borrowed and spent almost $1.4 trillion.

That’s a net increase of over $1.2 trillion. The entire increase in our GDP can be attributed to the increase in government spending. In fact, the increase in government spending is almost two times the increase in our GDP. That means the economy is doing very poorly indeed. Without massive increases in government borrowing and spending, there would be no recovery at all.

As a final note of how much the U.S. government has increased its borrowing and spending, in February 2011 alone we borrowed and spent $222 billion. That’s almost 40 percent more than in all of 2007.